Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

FACILITY PROGRAMMING LTD

FACILITY PROGRAMMING LTD received $451.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+501% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6M. Its largest customer was National Park Service ($455K).

Obligations · FY2026
$451.1K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CT6AEYF2KBA5
Parent company
FACILITY PROGRAMMING, LTD.
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -2.7MFY2017
  2. 1.8MFY2018
  3. 70.1KFY2019
  4. 60KFY2020
  5. 53.7KFY2021
  6. 468.3KFY2022
  7. 284.5KFY2023
  8. 934.8KFY2024
  9. 75.1KFY2025
  10. 451.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$455K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$10.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$10.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Park Service· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026· 140P2126F0122
  2. National Park Service· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· May 30, 2024 – Jul 20, 2026· 140P2124F0083
  3. National Park Service· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Apr 9, 2026 – Apr 9, 2026· 140P2126F0047
  4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Construction & real property· Sep 13, 2021 – Apr 2, 2026· 1305M421FNAAA0100

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. IPSWICH, MA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. DAVID M. DORNBUSCH AND COMPANY$1.2M+1,397% in FY2026
    PALM SPRINGS, CA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. MOUNTAIN MUSEUM MANAGEMENT LLC$1.2M−100% in FY2026
    AURORA, CO · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.