Federal contractor · ARLEE, MT

NATHAN SMITH

NATHAN SMITH received $288.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+131% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($288.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$288.7K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
GJUAH1K32S49
Parent company
NATHAN SMITH
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 205.6KFY2018
  3. 216.4KFY2020
  4. 63KFY2021
  5. 73.9KFY2022
  6. 133.8KFY2023
  7. 124.8KFY2025
  8. 288.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$288.7K100%
    6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$288.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. St. Louis County, MN$247K86%
  2. Missoula County, MT$41.7K14%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $288.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $288.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. NATHAN SMITH MNSUF002393 E24$134.2K
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Jul 15, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 1202SB26M2523
  2. NATHAN SMITH MNSUF002394 E24$112.8K
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Jul 31, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 1202SB26M2560
  3. NATHAN SMITH MTLNF260296 E110$14.8K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2026 – Aug 1, 2026· 1202SB26M2687
  4. NATHAN SMITH MTLNF260296 E111$11.1K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2026 – Aug 1, 2026· 1202SB26M1787
  5. NATHAN SMITH MTLNF260296 E112$11.1K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2026 – Aug 1, 2026· 1202SB26M1788
  6. NATHAN SMITH MTLNF260296 E105$4,725
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2026 – Aug 1, 2026· 1202SB26M1737

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAINMAKERS IRRIGATION L.L.C.$409.7K+74% in FY2026
    WHITEHALL, MT · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  2. BT FIRE & EVENT SERVICES LLC$401.2K−33% in FY2026
    CARMEN, ID · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  3. J.O. INTERNATIONAL REFORESTATION, INC.$393.6K−21% in FY2026
    GRANTS PASS, OR · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.