Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
VECTOR PLANNING & SERVICES, INC.
VECTOR PLANNING & SERVICES, INC. received $40.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $109.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($40.6M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $40.6M
- New awards
- 3
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- D717B1FT8GB5
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $40.6M in FY2026 together.
- VECTOR PLANNING & SERVICES, INC.ANCHORAGE, AK · Family page$40.6M
- VECTOR PLANNING & SERVICES, INC.MCLEAN, VA$0
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 10.5MFY2017
- 6.3MFY2018
- 5.6MFY2019
- 4.1MFY2020
- -162.7KFY2021
- 1.3MFY2022
- 1.5MFY2023
- 3.6MFY2024
- 35.8MFY2025
- 40.6MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$40.6M100%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$38.1M94%
- Professional services$2.5M6.1%
Where the work was performed
- San Diego County, CA$38.1M94%
- Charleston County, SC$2.5M6.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$500
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · -$500
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Mar 28, 2025 – May 26, 2026· N6523625F3008
- Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Sep 27, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· N6523624F3044
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Jan 2, 2019 – Jun 8, 2026· N0017819F8789
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $172.7K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $42.8K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $33.5K received
- FY2025: $1.9M paid out · $246K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
6 companies · $1.9M reported
- RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- PERSHING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$686.5KMARRIOTTSVILLE, MD · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- PLACENTIA, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $494.9K reported
- BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$452.2KMCLEAN, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- CSA GLOBAL LLC$42.8KVIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ALEXANDRIA INSIGHTS, INC.$79.7M−43% in FY2026STAFFORD, VA · 99.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- MOFFATT & NICHOL - BURNS & MCDONNELL HAWAII$79.1M+43% in FY2026HONOLULU, HI · 2 entities · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- JACOBS/B&M A JOINT VENTURE$83.1M−37% in FY2026ARLINGTON, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.