H.R. 9671 · 118th Congress

Department of Energy Artificial Intelligence Act of 2024

Introduced on Sep 18, 2024 by Brandon Williams (R-NY-22). One cosponsor. Latest action (Sep 25, 2024): Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Stage
Introduced
Introduced
Sep 18, 2024
Cosponsors
1
1 from the other party
Policy area
Science, Technology, Communications

Progress

The furthest stage the measure reached. Simple and concurrent resolutions do not go to the President.

  1. Introduced
  2. 2Reported by committee
  3. 3Passed one chamber
  4. 4Passed both chambers
  5. 5Sent to the President
  6. 6Became law

Official title

To provide guidance for and investment in the research and development activities of artificial intelligence at the Department of Energy, and for other purposes.

Subjects

  • Advanced technology and technological innovations
  • Computer security and identity theft
  • Computers and information technology
  • Congressional oversight
  • Employment and training programs
  • Energy efficiency and conservation
  • Higher education
  • Public utilities and utility rates
  • Public-private cooperation
  • Research and development

Summary

The Congressional Research Service has not summarized this measure yet.

Sponsor and cosponsors

Cosponsors by party as of the day they signed on. Original cosponsors signed on the day of introduction.

Brandon WilliamsR-NY-22Sponsor

Democrats · 1

Roll calls

Recorded votes on the measure. Most measures move by voice vote or unanimous consent, which record no individual positions.

No recorded roll call on this measure: it moved by voice vote or unanimous consent, or has not reached the floor.

History

Every action as published, oldest first. Roll calls link to how each member voted.

  1. Sep 18, 2024Introduced in House
  2. Sep 18, 2024Introduced in House
  3. Sep 18, 2024 · HouseReferred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
  4. Sep 25, 2024 · HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  5. Sep 25, 2024 · HouseOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Committees

Committees and subcommittees the measure was referred to.

Agencies in its committees' jurisdiction

Analisa's mapping of committee jurisdiction to federal agencies; the bill may touch others, or none of these.

Who lobbied on it

Organizations whose lobbying reports (LD-2) name this measure. Spending is what they reported for those quarters on all issues, not on this measure alone.

  1. UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER7 reports
    $494.4K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$7M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 100%
  2. AMPERE COMPUTING EMPLOYER LLC2 reports
    $140K reported (all issues)
  3. ARM INC.2 reports
    $70K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: ARM INCAI match · 96%
  4. BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE2 reports
    $440K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE$313.9M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 100%
  5. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.2 reports
    $37.2M reported (all issues)
  6. Digital Climate Alliance2 reports
    $40K reported (all issues)
  7. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC2 reports
    $100K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: FERMI RESEARCH ALLIANCE, LLCAI match · 100%
  8. Liquid Cooling Coalition2 reports
    $40K reported (all issues)
  9. Purdue University2 reports
    $100K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: PURDUE UNIVERSITY$17.7M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 100%
  10. University of Michigan2 reports
    $130K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANAI match · 100%
  11. University of Oklahoma2 reports
    $100K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$16M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 99%
  12. Association of American Universities1 report
    $41.3K reported (all issues)
  13. The Pennsylvania State University1 report
    $150K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$415.5M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 100%
  14. Vanderbilt University1 report
    $40K reported (all issues)Federal contractor: VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$1.6M in contracts, FY2026AI match · 100%

Reports filed in 2024, 2025.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 7, 2026 · loaded Oct 7, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives)Clerk of the House, Lobbying Disclosure Act filings (organizations only; lobbyists' names are not loaded) · data current to Oct 7, 2026 · loaded Oct 7, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.