H.R. 5107 · 119th Congress

Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act of 2025

Introduced on Sep 3, 2025 by Andrew S. Clyde (R-GA-9). 29 cosponsors, 1 of them from another party. Latest action (Nov 20, 2025): Received in the Senate.

Stage
Passed one chamber
Introduced
Sep 3, 2025
Cosponsors
29
1 from the other party
Policy area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Open in the Congress explorerCongress.govAlert me

Progress

The furthest stage the measure reached. Simple and concurrent resolutions do not go to the President.

  1. Introduced
  2. Reported by committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. 4Passed both chambers
  5. 5Sent to the President
  6. 6Became law

Official title

To repeal the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 enacted by the District of Columbia Council.

Subjects

  • District of Columbia
  • Law enforcement administration and funding
  • Law enforcement officers

Summary

By the Congressional Research Service (Introduced in House, Sep 3, 2025). Public domain.

Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act or the CLEAN DC Act

This bill repeals the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia.

Any provision of law amended or repealed by that act is restored or revived as if it had not been enacted.

(The act sets forth a variety of measures that focus on policing, including measures prohibiting the use of certain neck restraints by law enforcement officers, requiring additional procedures related to body-worn cameras, and expanding access to police disciplinary records.)

Sponsor and cosponsors

Cosponsors by party as of the day they signed on. Original cosponsors signed on the day of introduction.

Andrew S. ClydeR-GA-9Sponsor

Democrats · 1

Republicans · 28

Roll calls

Recorded votes on the measure. Most measures move by voice vote or unanimous consent, which record no individual positions.

  1. On Passage
    Nov 19, 2025· House· Passage· Passed 233–190

History

Every action as published, oldest first. Roll calls link to how each member voted.

  1. Sep 3, 2025Introduced in House
  2. Sep 3, 2025Introduced in House
  3. Sep 3, 2025 · HouseReferred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
  4. Sep 10, 2025 · HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  5. Sep 10, 2025 · HouseOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 19.
  6. Sep 30, 2025Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-317.
  7. Sep 30, 2025 · HouseReported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-317.
  8. Sep 30, 2025 · HousePlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 271.
  9. Nov 17, 2025 · HouseRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 879 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80.
  10. Nov 19, 2025 · HouseConsidered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 879. (consideration: CR H4800-4805)
  11. Nov 19, 2025 · HouseRule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80.
  12. Nov 19, 2025 · HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 5107.
  13. Nov 19, 2025 · HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  14. Nov 19, 2025 · HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 5107, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Clyde demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  15. Nov 19, 2025 · HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4806-4807)
  16. Nov 19, 2025Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 190 (Roll no. 299). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4800-4801)House · Roll call 299
  17. Nov 19, 2025 · HouseOn passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 190 (Roll no. 299). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4800-4801)House · Roll call 299
  18. Nov 19, 2025 · HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  19. Nov 20, 2025 · SenateReceived in the Senate.

Committees

Committees and subcommittees the measure was referred to.

Agencies in its committees' jurisdiction

Analisa's mapping of committee jurisdiction to federal agencies; the bill may touch others, or none of these.

Who lobbied on it

Organizations whose lobbying reports (LD-2) name this measure. Spending is what they reported for those quarters on all issues, not on this measure alone.

  1. DC Police Union4 reports
    $120K reported (all issues)
  2. Council of the District of Columbia3 reports
    $90K reported (all issues)
  3. National Fraternal Order of Police2 reports
    $200K reported (all issues)
  4. CONFERENCE OF PROVINCIALS OF NORTH AMERICA1 report
    $20K reported (all issues)
  5. Heritage Action for America1 report
    $20K reported (all issues)
  6. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.1 report
    $140K reported (all issues)
  7. Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights1 report
    $170K reported (all issues)
  8. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)1 report
    $15K reported (all issues)

Reports filed in 2025, 2026.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 6, 2026 · loaded Oct 6, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives)Clerk of the House, Lobbying Disclosure Act filings (organizations only; lobbyists' names are not loaded) · data current to Oct 6, 2026 · loaded Oct 6, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.