H.R. 672 · 119th Congress

To establish new ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes.

Introduced on Jan 23, 2025 by Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL-26). 13 cosponsors, 5 of them from another party. Latest action (Jul 22, 2025): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Stage
Passed one chamber
Introduced
Jan 23, 2025
Cosponsors
13
5 from the other party
Policy area
Government Operations and Politics
Open in the Congress explorerCongress.govAlert me

Progress

The furthest stage the measure reached. Simple and concurrent resolutions do not go to the President.

  1. Introduced
  2. Reported by committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. 4Passed both chambers
  5. 5Sent to the President
  6. 6Became law

Subjects

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Florida
  • Iowa
  • Postal service
  • Wisconsin
  • Wyoming

Summary

By the Congressional Research Service (Introduced in House, Jan 23, 2025). Public domain.

This bill requires the U.S Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for each of the following 14 communities:

  • Eastvale, California
  • Scotland, Connecticut
  • Castle Pines, Colorado
  • Silver Cliff, Colorado
  • Hollywood, Florida
  • Miami Lakes, Florida
  • Ocoee, Florida
  • Urbandale, Iowa
  • Franklin, Wisconsin
  • Greenfield, Wisconsin
  • Village of Caledonia, Wisconsin
  • Village of Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin
  • Village of Somers, Wisconsin
  • Mills, Wyoming

Sponsor and cosponsors

Cosponsors by party as of the day they signed on. Original cosponsors signed on the day of introduction.

Mario Diaz-BalartR-FL-26Sponsor

Democrats · 5

Republicans · 8

Roll calls

Recorded votes on the measure. Most measures move by voice vote or unanimous consent, which record no individual positions.

No recorded roll call on this measure: it moved by voice vote or unanimous consent, or has not reached the floor.

History

Every action as published, oldest first. Roll calls link to how each member voted.

  1. Jan 23, 2025Introduced in House
  2. Jan 23, 2025Introduced in House
  3. Jan 23, 2025 · HouseReferred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
  4. May 21, 2025 · HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  5. May 21, 2025 · HouseOrdered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 1.
  6. Jul 21, 2025 · HouseMr. Comer moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
  7. Jul 21, 2025 · HouseConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3492-3493)
  8. Jul 21, 2025 · HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 672.
  9. Jul 21, 2025Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3492)
  10. Jul 21, 2025 · HouseOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3492)
  11. Jul 21, 2025 · HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  12. Jul 22, 2025 · SenateReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Committees

Committees and subcommittees the measure was referred to.

Agencies in its committees' jurisdiction

Analisa's mapping of committee jurisdiction to federal agencies; the bill may touch others, or none of these.

Who lobbied on it

Organizations whose lobbying reports (LD-2) name this measure. Spending is what they reported for those quarters on all issues, not on this measure alone.

  1. City of Coconut Creek, FL6 reports
    $70K reported (all issues)
  2. City of Fort Myers, Florida6 reports
    $120K reported (all issues)
  3. NEBRASKA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION6 reports
  4. National ZIP Code Advocacy Coalition (Informal Coalition)3 reports
    $110K reported (all issues)

Reports filed in 2025, 2026.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
  • Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives)Clerk of the House, Lobbying Disclosure Act filings (organizations only; lobbyists' names are not loaded) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.