Representative · Maryland's 5th district
Steny H. Hoyer
Steny H. Hoyer is a Democratic representative for Maryland's 5th district, in Congress since 1981. In the 119th Congress, 675 roll calls were held while they served; they missed 19, and cast 445 of 461 party-unity votes with the majority of their caucus.
- Party
- Democrat
- Chamber
- House
- Current
- In Congress since
- Jan 5, 1981
- Term ends
- Jan 3, 2027

Record by Congress
Counts with their denominators for each Congress and chamber served. Ranks are among members who served most of that Congress (100 or more roll calls): rank 1 did it most often. A description, not a grade.
| Congress | Roll calls | Missed | Votes with party | Sponsored | Cosponsored across the aisle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 119th CongressHouse of Representatives | 675 | 2.8%19 of 675 · rank 143 of 439 | 97%445 of 461 · rank 331 of 439 | 10 became law | 17%25 of 143 |
| 118th CongressHouse of Representatives | 1,222 | 6.2%76 of 1,222 · rank 65 of 442 | 98%773 of 791 · rank 208 of 442 | 20 became law | 14%13 of 95 |
| 117th CongressHouse of Representatives | 997 | 2.5%25 of 997 · rank 97 of 443 | 98%557 of 566 · rank 189 of 443 | 120 became law | 0%0 of 49 |
Ideology (DW-NOMINATE)
Voteview's DW-NOMINATE first dimension estimates where members sit from all their roll calls: liberal (−1) to conservative (+1). It describes voting patterns, not views. Shown for the 119th Congress (House), with each party's median and the chamber's range.
Source: Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/
Votes against their party
The latest party-unity votes on bills and amendments where the member voted yea or nay against most of their caucus.
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments· Passed 262–159· Against party
- Jul 21, 2026· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Agreed to 265–161· Against party
- Jul 15, 2026· House· Amendments· On Agreeing to the Amendment· Failed 104–314· Against party
- Jun 30, 2026· House· Passage· On Agreeing to the Resolution· Failed 189–235· Against party
- May 14, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 308–116· Against party
- May 13, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 218–203· Against party
- Apr 29, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 235–191· Against party
- Apr 23, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 231–186· Against party
Recent votes
The latest roll calls on bills and amendments, with the member's recorded position.
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass· Passed 401–14
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 415–9
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 417–3
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 214–208
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 217–207
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 352–72
- Sep 16, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments· Passed 262–159· Against party
- Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Agreeing to the Resolution· Passed 220–204
- Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Passage· Passed 216–211
- Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 408–17
- Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass· Passed 343–79
- Sep 15, 2026· House· Passage· On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended· Passed 424–0
Sponsored bills
Bills and resolutions the member introduced as sponsor in the loaded Congresses. Volume is not quality: most measures never leave committee.
15 sponsored · 0 became law
How far they got
- Introduced533%
- Passed one chamber853%
- Passed both chambers213%
Policy areas
- Congress9
- Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues2
- International Affairs2
- Government Operations and Politics1
- Public Lands and Natural Resources1
Latest activity
- H.R. 10443 American Procurement Improvement Act of 2026Introduced· Government Operations and Politics· Sep 16, 2026
- H.R. 9867 Combatting Global Deforestation Act of 2024Introduced· International Affairs· Sep 27, 2024
- H.Con.Res. 43 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.Passed both chambers· Congress· Jun 15, 2023
- H.Res. 1507 Providing for the printing of a revised edition of the Rules and Manual of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.Passed one chamber· Congress· Dec 2, 2022
- H.Res. 552 Recognizing the importance of independent living for individuals with disabilities made possible by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and calling for further action to strengthen home and community living for individuals with disabilities.Introduced· Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues· Nov 1, 2022
- H.Res. 1270 Recognizing the importance of independent living for individuals with disabilities made possible by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and calling for further action to strengthen home and community living for individuals with disabilities.Introduced· Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues· Nov 1, 2022
- H.R. 2024 Southern Maryland National Heritage Area ActPassed one chamber· Public Lands and Natural Resources· Jul 20, 2022
- H.Con.Res. 88 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.Passed both chambers· Congress· Jun 21, 2022
Committees
Seats as published by the congress-legislators project. Past seats are those no longer listed since Analisa began recording them.
Federal contracts in the district
Contract obligations attributed to Maryland's 5th district by each action's county and its award's ZIP code (land shares through census tracts); an estimate where ZIP codes cross district lines. Shown next to the member's record: neither explains the other.
- Obligations · FY2026
- $5.3B
- Per resident
- $6,691
- Rank in Maryland
- 3 of 8
- Contract actions
- 17.9K
- New awards: 4,742
By fiscal year
- 5.1BFY2017
- 5.8BFY2018
- 6.2BFY2019
- 6.3BFY2020
- 6BFY2021
- 6.9BFY2022
- 7.8BFY2023
- 8.3BFY2024
- 8.6BFY2025
- 5.3BFY2026
Top buyers
- Department of the Navy$2.4B46%Department of Defense
- Department of Defense
- Department of the Army$359.5M6.8%Department of Defense
- Department of the Air Force$343M6.5%Department of Defense
- Federal Acquisition Service$320.9M6.1%General Services Administration
- Defense Contract Management Agency$253.1M4.8%Department of Defense
- U.S. Cyber Command$117.8M2.2%Department of Defense
- Defense Logistics Agency$49.2M0.9%Department of Defense
Top recipients
- LEIDOS, INC.$491.6M9.3%21 awards
- V2X AEROSPACE LLC$375.2M7.1%2 awards
- CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC$204.4M3.9%3 awards
- KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC$176.7M3.3%48 awards
- 75 awards
- BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$138M2.6%47 awards
- 29 awards
- PRECISE SYSTEMS, INC.$86M1.6%22 awards
- 50 awards
- 94 awards
Campaign money
What the member's campaigns reported receiving, per FEC two-year cycle, and the federal contracts of the organizations that sponsor the giving PACs (each sponsor matched to a contract recipient by AI, with its probability). Comparisons of public records: neither explains the other.
2026 cycle
- Raised
- $402.3K
- through Jun 30, 2026
- Cash on hand
- $322.9K
- From committees
- $240K
- 79 committees
- From contractor PACs
- $58K
- 21 PACs · 24% of committee money
Largest gifts from PACs of federal contractors, 2026
| PAC sponsor | Given | Matched contract recipient | Its contracts, FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| general dynamics corporationgeneral dynamics corporation political action committee (general dynamics employee pac) | $5,000 | GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC.AI match · 100% · of one corporate family | $29.3K |
| northrop grumman corporationemployees of northrop grumman corporation pac | $5,000 | NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONAI match · 100% · of one corporate family | $1.1B |
| honeywell internationalhoneywell international inc. technologies public affairs council (honpac) | $5,000 | HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.AI match · 100% · the same organization | $260.5M |
| rtx corporationemployees of rtx corporation political action committee | $5,000 | RTX CORPORATIONAI match · 100% · the same organization | $3.9B |
| l3harris technologies, inc.l3harris technologies, inc. pac | $5,000 | L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100% · the same organization | $115.4M |
| general atomicsgeneral atomics political action committee | $5,000 | GENERAL ATOMICSAI match · 95% · the same organization | — |
| u.s. bancorpu.s. bancorp federal political action committee | $5,000 | U.S. BANCORPAI match · 99% · the same organization | $8M |
| constellation energy corporationconstellation energy corporation employee political action committee (cepac) | $5,000 | CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY INCAI match · 100% · of one corporate family | $1.9M |
| jpmorgan chase & co.jpmorgan chase & co. federal political action committee | $3,000 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONAI match · 100% · of one corporate family | $1.5M |
| science applications international corporationscience applications international corporation voluntary political action committee | $3,000 | SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONAI match · 100% · the same organization | $3.5B |
By cycle
| Cycle | Raised (FEC summary) | From committees | From contractor PACs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $402.3K | $240K | $58K21 PACs · 24% of committee money |
| 2024 | $1.8M | $1.1M | $285.5K61 PACs · 26% of committee money |
| 2022 | $3.9M | $2.3M | $604K97 PACs · 27% of committee money |
Raised is the FEC's cumulative summary of the candidacy; committee money counts each contribution reported, so the two cover slightly different dates.
Terms
Every term in the House or Senate, as published by the congress-legislators project.
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 2025 – Jan 3, 2027
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 2023 – Jan 3, 2025
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 2021 – Jan 3, 2023
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 2019 – Jan 3, 2021
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 2017 – Jan 3, 2019
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 6, 2015 – Jan 3, 2017
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 2013 – Jan 3, 2015
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 5, 2011 – Jan 3, 2013
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 6, 2009 – Jan 3, 2011
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 4, 2007 – Jan 3, 2009
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 4, 2005 – Jan 3, 2007
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 7, 2003 – Jan 3, 2005
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 2001 – Jan 3, 2003
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 6, 1999 – Jan 3, 2001
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 7, 1997 – Jan 3, 1999
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 4, 1995 – Jan 3, 1997
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 5, 1993 – Jan 3, 1995
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 1991 – Jan 3, 1993
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 1989 – Jan 3, 1991
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 6, 1987 – Jan 3, 1989
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 1985 – Jan 3, 1987
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 3, 1983 – Jan 3, 1985
- House · Maryland's 5th districtJan 5, 1981 – Jan 3, 1983
Contact
Official channels, as published.
- Website
- hoyer.house.gov
- Phone
- 202-225-4131
- Office
- 1705 Longworth House Office Building
Identifiers
The same member in other public records.
Sources and method
Every figure on this page traces to these records.
- Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
- House roll-call votes (Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, roll-call vote records · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
- Senate roll-call votes and DW-NOMINATE scores (Voteview (UCLA Department of Political Science))Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Sonnet (2026). Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. https://voteview.com/ · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Free to use with the required citation
- Bill status: bills and resolutions, sponsors, actions, subjects and CRS summaries (U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo), from Congress.gov (Library of Congress))GovInfo Bill Status bulk data (Congress.gov; summaries by the Congressional Research Service) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
- Congressional district boundaries and relationship files (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, Cartographic Boundary Files (congressional districts) and 2020 relationship files · release cd116+cd118+cd119 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
- ZIP code (ZCTA) to congressional district crosswalk (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 relationship files (ZCTAs, tracts and congressional districts); shares computed by Analisa · release 2020 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
- Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov)USAspending.gov, prime award contract transactions (FPDS) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
- Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission)FEC bulk data: committee master, candidate master (candidates' names, no addresses), linkages, PAC summaries, all-candidates summaries and contributions from committees (no individual contributors) · data current to Oct 9, 2026 · loaded Oct 9, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
- Positions are shown only where a roll call recorded them; voice votes and unanimous consent record none.
- Activity counts describe volume and attendance; they are not a measure of quality.
- Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.