Scores by category

Each category averages its indicators' percentile scores among US metro and micro areas.

Safety46#500/924
Economy82#167/925
Housing5#883/925
Health86#133/925
Healthcare91#80/923
Environment20#736/917
Education76#223/925
Infrastructure86#127/925
Community32#626/925
Leisure & amenities67#303/925

Strengths · Weaknesses

Indicators where Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area ranks highest and lowest among US metro and micro areas (score = percentile, 100 = best).

Strengths

Access to exercise opportunities · high96.9%
98/100California 94.3%United States 84.5%2022 & 2024University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteAggregated from counties
Average weekly wage · high$1,538
97/100California $1,865United States $1,5142025U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Broadband subscriptions · high93.8%
96/100California 93.5%United States 91.0%2020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B28002
Median household income · high$97,188
95/100California $100,130United States $81,6042020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B19013
Adult smoking · low11.3%
94/100California 12.6%United States 16.1%2023University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteAggregated from counties
Adult obesity · low28.8%
94/100California 30.4%United States 38.2%2023University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteAggregated from counties

Weaknesses

Median Air Quality Index · high55
5/100California 602025U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
High ozone days · high5 days
6/100California 38 daysUnited States 7 days2022Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyAggregated from counties
Home price to income ratio · high6.1×
6/100California 7.4×United States 4.1×2020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B25077
Severe housing problems · high20.5%
7/100California 25.8%United States 16.8%2017-2021University of Wisconsin Population Health InstituteAggregated from counties
Rent as share of income · high33.4%
8/100California 32.8%United States 30.6%2020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B25071
Rent-burdened households · high56.5%
8/100California 55.3%United States 51.1%2020-2024U.S. Census Bureau Census table B25070

Trends

The largest changes over about five years, next to the country's over the same periods.

Drought exposureImproving
100% (2021) → 2% (Nov 2025–Oct 2026)
−98 pts5 yearsUS 40% → 43%
New business applicationsImproving
9.5 /1k (2020) → 18.3 /1k (2025)
+93%5 yearsUS 13.1 /1k → 16.6 /1k
High ozone daysImproving
16 days (2017) → 5 days (2022)
−67%5 yearsUS 9 days → 7 days
Days with unhealthy airImproving
13.7% (2020) → 1.4% (2025)
−12 pts5 years
Voter turnoutWorsening
72.1% (2020) → 64.8% (2024)
−7.3 pts4 yearsUS 68.5% → 65.2%
Median household incomeImproving
$72,280 (2015-2019) → $97,188 (2020-2024)
+34%5 yearsCensus table B19013US $65,712 → $81,604

What changed in five years

How each measure moved between two periods about five years apart, read against whether more or less is better, the published margin of error and the same change in other places.

Over about five years, Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area improved on 15 of 32 measures with a comparison and declined on 9. 0 moved within the margin of error and 8 barely changed.

Earlier period
Latest period
Lower standingHigher standing

Position is the place's standing among metro and micro areas: further right is better, whichever way the measure counts. Periods differ by measure (most compare 2015-2019 with 2020-2024); each row names its own in its tooltip and in the table.

Improved15

New businesses+93%9.5 /1k → 18.3 /1k
Household income+34%$72,280 → $97,188
Arts & recreation+23%3.4 /10k → 4.2 /10k
Firearm deaths−20%10.1 /100k → 8.1 /100k
Poverty−1.9 points13.4% → 11.5%

Declined9

Overdose deaths+47%16.8 /100k → 24.6 /100k
Transit use−1 points2.3% → 1.3%
Libraries−6.9%0.3 /10k → 0.3 /10k
Violent crime+5.9%379 /100k → 402 /100k
Price / income+0.7×5.4× → 6.1×

All 32 measures

Change of every measure of Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area between two periods about five years apart
Measure	Before	After	Change	Reading	Favourable vs peers
Arts, entertainment and recreation	3.4 /10k2020	4.2 /10k2025	+23%	Improved	79%
Average commute time	27.6 min2015-2019	27.1 min2020-2024	−0.5 min	Little change	77%
Average weekly wage	$1,2862020	$1,5382025	+20%	Improved	19%
Bachelor's degree or higher	33.5%2015-2019	37.1%2020-2024	+3.5 points	Improved	67%
Broadband subscriptions	88.2%2015-2019	93.8%2020-2024	+5.6 points	Improved	12%
Child poverty rate	16.8%2015-2019	13.4%2020-2024	−3.4 points	Improved	63%
Distance to an airport	18 mi2020	18 mi2025	+0 mi	Little change	18%
Drug overdose deaths	16.8 /100k2020	24.6 /100kMar 2025–Feb 2026	+47%	Declined	10%
Effective property tax rate	0.86%2015-2019	0.77%2020-2024	−0.1 points	Little change	37%
Firearm deaths	10.1 /100k2020	8.1 /100kMay 2025–Apr 2026	−20%	Improved	82%
Grocery stores	1.7 /10k2020	1.8 /10k2025	+4.8%	Little change	67%
Gyms and fitness centers	1.3 /10k2020	1.4 /10k2025	+1.4%	Little change	47%
High school diploma or higher	89.3%2015-2019	90.1%2020-2024	+0.8 points	Improved	23%
Home price to income ratio	5.4×2015-2019	6.1×2020-2024	+0.7×	Declined	26%
Homicide rate	6.0 /100k2020	3.9 /100kMay 2025–Apr 2026	−35%	Improved	62%
Income adjusted for local prices	$52,7622019	$69,8902024	+32%	Improved	56%
Income inequality (Gini index)	0.4602015-2019	0.4542020-2024	−0.006	Little change	71%
Median household income	$72,2802015-2019	$97,1882020-2024	+34%	Improved	84%
New business applications	9.5 /1k2020	18.3 /1k2025	+93%	Improved	93%
Pharmacies	1.3 /10k2020	1.1 /10k2025	−15%	Declined	32%
Poverty rate	13.4%2015-2019	11.5%2020-2024	−1.9 points	Improved	71%
Property crime rate	2,012 /100k2020	1,476 /100k2025	−27%	Improved	35%
Public libraries	0.3 /10k2019	0.3 /10k2024	−6.9%	Declined	18%
Public transit commuters	2.3%2015-2019	1.3%2020-2024	−1 points	Declined	14%
Rent as share of income	32.2%2015-2019	33.4%2020-2024	+1.2 points	Declined	33%
Rent-burdened households	54.3%2015-2019	56.5%2020-2024	+2.2 points	Declined	38%
Restaurants and bars	7.5 /10k2020	7.9 /10k2025	+4.7%	Little change	65%
Suicide rate	12.1 /100k2020	11.8 /100kMay 2025–Apr 2026	−2.4%	Little change	65%
Traffic deaths	10.4 /100k2015-2019	11.5 /100k2020-2024	+10%	Declined	45%
Unemployment rate	8.7%2020	5.0%2025	−3.7 points	Improved	71%
Uninsured residents (under 65)	5.9%2015-2019	5.3%2020-2024	−0.6 points	Improved	61%
Violent crime rate	379 /100k2020	402 /100k2025	+5.9%	Declined	20%

“Against peers” compares the change with the same change in the 708 metro and micro areas that have the same two periods. It describes how common a change is, not why it happened.

Sources: Regional Economic Accounts; Local Area Unemployment Statistics; Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages; Mapping Injury, Overdose, and Violence; American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates; Business Formation Statistics; Uniform Crime Reporting Program, Return A master files; Public Libraries Survey; Fatality Analysis Reporting System; Distance to airports and intercity rail. Values are the latest and the one five years earlier of the same publisher dataset; datasets that changed publisher in between are never compared.

Survey estimates (American Community Survey) compare the two most recent 5-year windows that do not share years, so the margin of error of the difference holds. The 2015-2019 window predates the pandemic and 2020-2024 includes it.
A change counts only when it is larger than 1.645 times the square root of the two standard errors squared, summed (a 90% margin). Measures published without a margin must change by at least 5% to count.
“Against peers” compares the change with the same change in the 925 metro and micro areas that have the same two periods. It describes how common a change is, not why it happened.
Standing is a percentile among the same places: 0 is the lowest value on the measure (or the worst when lower is better), 100 the best.

Metro and micro areas like Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area five years ago that improved

The places whose measures looked most like those of Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area in the earlier period, ranked by how many measures improved beyond the margin of error, minus how many declined. A comparison of published data, not a forecast and not advice.

For comparison, Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area itself moved +0.4 points in standing on average over the same 30 measures (standings of all places average about zero).

How the ranking works

Similarity is the root-mean-square difference of standings in the earlier period over the measures most places have. Places are ranked by measures that improved beyond the margin of error minus those that declined (a count that estimation noise in small places cannot inflate), then by the mean change of standing over the measures a place has in both periods. Only places with more improvements than declines and a rise in standing are listed. Standings are relative, so a place can improve in absolute terms and still lose standing.

Who lives here

Age, race and education of residents, from the American Community Survey. Shares are of all residents (age), residents of every origin (race) or adults 25 and over (education).

Age and sex

2,426,388 residents

Men
Women

80 and over
70–79
60–69

Income

How household income is spread, not just the middle: each bar is the share of households in that income range.

Household income

881,889 households (±2,127)

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area
United States share

Under $25k12%107,774
$25k–50k13%115,476
$50k–75k14%120,297

Homes

Who owns and who rents, what homes cost, and what the housing stock looks like.

Owners and renters

881,889 households (±2,127)

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area
United States share

Own63%555,650
Rent37%326,239

Biggest shift since 2015–2019: Own (+2.7 points).

Table view

Getting to work

How workers travel to their job and how long it takes them.

How people get to work

1,113,662 workers (±6,456)

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area
United States share

Drive alone66%733,762
Carpool8.5%94,689
Public transit1.3%14,200

Jobs and pay

What the largest occupations here pay, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey.

The 10 largest occupations in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA employ 253,080 people. 8 pay a median above the US median and 2 below it.

Above the US median
Below the US median

The largest occupations in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA by employment, with median annual pay and how it compares with the United States
Occupation	Jobs	Median pay	vs USCompared with the US	Concentration
Home Health and Personal Care Aides60,350 jobs	60,350	$34,320US $35,800	−4%	2.02×
Management Analysts25,600 jobs	25,600	$82,990US $101,860	−19%	4.1×
Fast Food and Counter Workers24,910 jobs	24,910	$42,860US $31,200	+37%	0.93×
Registered Nurses23,590 jobs	23,590	$171,460US $97,550	+76%	1.0×
Retail Salespersons22,970 jobs	22,970	$38,100US $35,410	+8%	0.85×
Office Clerks, General21,340 jobs	21,340	$48,940US $45,010	+9%	1.25×
Cashiers19,910 jobs	19,910	$36,790US $32,880	+12%	0.93×
Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand18,560 jobs	18,560	$45,930US $40,240	+14%	0.91×
General and Operations Managers17,980 jobs	17,980	$118,460US $105,770	+12%	0.74×
Stockers and Order Fillers17,870 jobs	17,870	$43,200US $37,330	+16%	0.91×

Look up any occupation

Search more than 800 occupations and see what they pay in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA.

Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, 2025-05 (all industries and ownerships) bls.gov/oes

Reference period: 2025-05. BLS publishes metro areas, states and the nation (not counties or cities), so a county or city page shows its metro area.
Pay is not adjusted for the cost of living, so a higher median does not mean more purchasing power.
BLS caps the highest wages it publishes: where a figure is shown as “or more”, the real value is at least that much.
Some occupations (teachers, performers) are published by the hour or school year and shown here as an annual figure.

Local businesses

Employer businesses and sole proprietors by industry, per resident and against the state and the nation. Counts of businesses next to counts of people, not a measure of demand.

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA has 55,974 employer establishments, 230 for every 10,000 residents (0.93× the US rate of 248), with 825,511 paid employees at an average annual pay of $69,181. The Census Bureau also counts 207,516 nonemployer businesses, mostly sole proprietors.

Establishments: 55,974; 207,516 nonemployers
Per 10,000 residents: 230; US 248
Paid employees: 825,511
Average annual pay: $69,181; US $68,342

Employer establishments, employees, average pay and nonemployers of Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA by industry, with the density per resident against the nation

Restaurants and other eating places	4,648	19.1	1.04×About typical	83,278	$26,037	795
Ambulatory health care services	4,631	19	0.91×About typical	68,161	$94,276	7,607
Specialty trade contractors	3,927	16.1	1.04×About typical	45,415	$78,590	8,655
Lessors of real estate	3,154	12.9	1.05×About typical	13,772	$62,508	17,908
Limited-service restaurants	2,027	8.3	1.04×About typical	36,692	$22,870	322
Construction of buildings	2,003	8.2	1.09×About typical	17,111	$92,982	6,944
Management, scientific and technical consulting	1,825	7.5	1.12×About typical	10,884	$94,059	7,717
Full-service restaurants	1,815	7.5	0.97×About typical	35,856	$30,325	298
Truck transportation	1,624	6.7	1.32×More than typical	8,695	$56,534	10,875
Services to buildings and dwellings	1,598	6.6	0.97×About typical	20,172	$46,186	9,959
Building equipment contractors	1,522	6.2	1.04×About typical	21,254	$82,852	1,946
Real estate agents and brokers	1,368	5.6	1.15×About typical	3,110	$73,102	6,736

Rank places for an industry

County Business Patterns (2023); Nonemployer Statistics (2024)

Per-resident figures divide by the population estimate of 2023: 2,435,884 residents here, 336,755,052 in the United States. County Business Patterns counts establishments in 2023; the Nonemployer Statistics count businesses in 2024.
“More than typical” is a density at least 1.25 times the nation's per resident, “fewer” at most 0.8 times, with at least 10 establishments. It compares counts of businesses with counts of people: it says nothing about demand, incomes, size, quality or profit, and visitors and commuters are not residents.
The Census Bureau adds noise to employment and payroll to protect confidentiality, and withholds some figures: an industry with few establishments can show employees or pay as unavailable.
Industries overlap: a narrower industry (full-service restaurants) is part of a broader one (restaurants), so the rows do not add up.
A metro area's figures are the exact sums of its counties.
Industries follow the North American Industry Classification System; the two surveys use different editions (NAICS 2017 and 2022), which this page matches industry by industry.

Federal contract spending

In FY2026, federal agencies obligated $725.3M on contracts performed in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area: $293 per resident (US $2,008).

Obligations: $725.3M; −66% vs FY2025
Per resident: $293; US $2,008
Sole-source: 23%; US 30%
Single offer: 7.8%; US 8.7%

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Top buying agencies

Defense Microelectronics Activity$139.4M19%
Department of Veterans Affairs$130M18%
Department of the Army$121M17%
Department of the Navy$83.8M12%
Office of Procurement Operations$37.1M5.1%
Forest Service$34.5M4.8%
Bureau of Reclamation$32.3M4.4%
Department of the Air Force$30.7M4.2%

Top recipients

BLACKWATCH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$124.2M17%
KRATOS UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC$84.5M12%
THE DUTRA GROUP$72.1M9.9%
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$26.8M3.7%
ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC$20.7M2.9%

Spending by fiscal year

7.7BFY2017
7.7BFY2018
6.6BFY2019
4.2BFY2020
4BFY2021
4.3BFY2022
4.9BFY2023
4.5B

Top industries (NAICS)

Facilities support services · 5612$131.7M18%
Other heavy and civil engineering construction · 2379$105.2M15%
Aerospace product and parts manufacturing · 3364$98.2M14%
Investigation and security services · 5616$40M5.5%
Nonresidential building construction · 2362$38.3M5.3%
Architectural, engineering, and related services · 5413$23.1M

Largest awards

MANAGED CARE SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE TRICARE PROGRAM$23.5B
HEALTH NET FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC· Sacramento County, CA· Health & medical· Jan 10, 2017 – Apr 15, 2026· HT940216C0002
SUBSONIC AERIAL TARGET (SSAT) BQM-177A FULL RATE PRODUCTION$238.8M
KRATOS UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC· Sacramento County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 31, 2023 – Mar 16, 2026· N0001923C0021
THE SACRAMENTO WEIR WIDENING WILL REDUCE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN SACRAMENTO RIVER AND ALLOW WATER TO FLOW INTO THE YOLO BYPASS SYSTEM. PROJECT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF A PASSIVE WEIR, LEVEE SETBACK, FISH PASSAGE CONTROL AMONG OTHERS.$203.6M
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY· Yolo County, CA· Construction & real property· May 3, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· W9123823C0014

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Federal grants & assistance

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

In FY2026, federal agencies obligated $13.6B in grants, loans, direct payments and insurance for Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area: $5,502 per resident (US $12,975).

Assistance · FY2026: $13.6B; −1.2% vs FY2025
Per resident: $5,502; US $12,975
Loan face value: $2.2B; lent or guaranteed
To individuals: 0.4%; counted, never named

Top programs

96.002 · Social Security Retirement Insurance$8.6B63%
64.109 · Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected Disability$1.1B8.2%
96.001 · Social Security Disability Insurance$828.1M6.1%
96.004 · Social Security Survivors Insurance$668.5M4.9%
96.006 · Supplemental Security Income$548M4.0%
84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$377.4M2.8%
14.871 · Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers$286.4M2.1%
20.205 · Highway Planning and Construction$145.6M1.1%

Top recipients (organizations)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CALIFORNIA$320.6M2.4%
SACRAMENTO, CA
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO$247.2M1.8%
SACRAMENTO, CA
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS$244.7M1.8%
DAVIS, CA
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO$97.8M0.7%
SACRAMENTO, CA
SACRAMENTO EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AGENCY$72.2M0.5%
SACRAMENTO, CA
LOS RIOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$43M0.3%
SACRAMENTO, CA
CARRINGTON COLLEGE (CA), INC.$39.4M0.3%
SACRAMENTO, CA
LOS RIOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$29.8M0.2%
SACRAMENTO, CA

Organizations only: awards to individuals and county aggregate records count in the totals but are never listed. Grants to state governments recorded at the agency's own address are counted statewide, not in the capital's county.

Top agencies

Social Security Administration$10.7B78%
Under Secretary for Benefits/Veterans Benefits Administration$1.3B9.6%
Department of Veterans Affairs
Department of Education$403.6M3.0%
Federal Highway Administration$323.5M2.4%
Department of Transportation
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing$307.8M2.3%
Department of Housing and Urban Development
National Institutes of Health$91.7M0.7%
Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families$84.5M0.6%
Department of Health and Human Services
Railroad Retirement Board$70.5M0.5%

By type

Direct payments$12.9B95%
Grants$716.9M5.3%
Other assistance$22.8M0.2%
Insurance$3M0.0%
Loans$00.0%
$2.2B lent or guaranteed

Assistance by fiscal year

12.6BFY2021
11.3BFY2022
11.8BFY2023
13BFY2024
13.8BFY2025
13.6BFY2026

County aggregates

89%

Share of obligations reported only as county totals of many small awards (for example Social Security or Medicare payments), with no recipient named.

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Counties in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA

Whole counties, as the U.S. Office of Management and Budget delineates the area. Federal spending below is the exact sum of these counties.

Principal cities

The cities the area is named for.

Largest cities and towns

By population, for places with most of their residents in the area.

Other metro and micro areas in California

Areas based in California, best score first.

Neighboring metro and micro areas

Places that share a border, best score first.

Similar metro and micro areas

Closest indicator profiles across the country (no model: score distances).

Data and sources

Latest published value of each indicator; periods differ by source. Values flagged by their publisher are marked.

Mapping Injury, Overdose, and ViolenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · release 2026-10-01
PLACES: Local Data for Better HealthCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · release 2025
Daily county PM2.5 and ozone (EPA downscaler model)Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · release 2022
Care Compare: Hospital General Information and Timely and Effective CareCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services · release 2026-07-22
Distance to airports and intercity railFederal Aviation Administration · Bureau of Transportation Statistics · U.S. Census Bureau · release 2025+amtrak-2026-04-23
Uniform Crime Reporting Program, Return A master filesFederal Bureau of Investigation · release 2025
Public Libraries SurveyInstitute of Museum and Library Services · release FY2024
U.S. Drought Monitor county statisticsNational Drought Mitigation Center (University of Nebraska–Lincoln), USDA and NOAA · release 2026-10-06
Fatality Analysis Reporting SystemNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration · release 2024
nClimGrid-Daily county averagesNOAA National Centers for Environmental Information · release 2025
Regional Economic AccountsU.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · release 2024
Local Area Unemployment StatisticsU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · release 2025
Quarterly Census of Employment and WagesU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · release 2026 Q1
American Community Survey 5-Year EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2017-2024
Building Permits SurveyU.S. Census Bureau · release 2026-08
Business Formation StatisticsU.S. Census Bureau · release 2026-10-01
Population Estimates ProgramU.S. Census Bureau · release 2025
Small Area Health Insurance EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2024
Small Area Income and Poverty EstimatesU.S. Census Bureau · release 2024
Alternative Fuels Data Center station locatorU.S. Department of Energy · release 2026-10
Election Administration and Voting SurveyU.S. Election Assistance Commission · release 2024
Air Quality Index Annual Summary by CountyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency · release 2025
County Health Rankings & RoadmapsUniversity of Wisconsin Population Health Institute · release 2022-2025+2026-03-supplement
Zillow Home Value Index, Observed Rent Index and affordabilityZillow Research · release 2026-08

JSON · /api/v1/places/M40900

Scores by category

Strengths · Weaknesses

Strengths

Weaknesses

Trends

What changed in five years

Improved15

Declined9

Metro and micro areas like Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area five years ago that improved

Who lives here

Age and sex

Income

Household income

Homes

Owners and renters

Getting to work

How people get to work

Jobs and pay

Look up any occupation

Local businesses

Federal contract spending

Top buying agencies

Top recipients

Spending by fiscal year

Top industries (NAICS)

Largest awards

Federal grants & assistance

Top programs

Top recipients (organizations)

Top agencies

By type

Assistance by fiscal year

County aggregates

Counties in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA

Principal cities

Largest cities and towns

Other metro and micro areas in California

Neighboring metro and micro areas

Similar metro and micro areas

Data and sources

Improved15

Declined9

Top programs

Top recipients (organizations)

Top agencies

By type

Assistance by fiscal year

County aggregates

Age and sex

Household income

Owners and renters

How people get to work

Race and Hispanic origin

Education

Rent paid

Home values

Age of homes

Size of homes

Time to get to work

Look up any occupation

Top buying agencies

Top recipients

Spending by fiscal year

Top industries (NAICS)

Largest awards

What was bought