Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

202 GROUP LLC

202 GROUP LLC received $290.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−80% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $44.2M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($290K).

Obligations · FY2026
$290.5K
New awards
2
Sole-source
99.8%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FPQ6XDL31YX5
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 50KFY2019
  2. 5.4MFY2020
  3. -50KFY2021
  4. 24.3MFY2022
  5. 10.4MFY2023
  6. 2.4MFY2024
  7. 1.5MFY2025
  8. 290.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Energy$290K99.8%
    1 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.2%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$290K99.8%
  2. Research & development$5000.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$290K99.8%
  2. Madison County, AL$5000.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99.8%
    US 39% · $290K
  • Sole-source awards99.8%
    US 30% · $290K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Energy$290K
    Department of Energy · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. SCRM PROCUREMENT ANALYSIST CAPABILITY - SBIR PHASE III$290K
    Department of Energy· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 20, 2026 – Aug 20, 2026· 89233126CNA000455
  2. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF923

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CDIT LLC$3.7M+65% in FY2026
    SLIDELL, LA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. KITMAN LABS, INC.$3.7M−100% in FY2026
    HEALDSBURG, CA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. HGSNET, LLC$4.2M−96% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.