Federal contractor · SILVER SPRING, MD
A & T SYSTEMS, INC.
A & T SYSTEMS, INC. received $15.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $147.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($13.2M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $15.1M
- New awards
- 13
- Sole-source
- 25%
- Single offer
- 0.5%
- UEI
- XNQZKQDJ7U76
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 10.8MFY2017
- 13.3MFY2018
- 14.8MFY2019
- 14.6MFY2020
- 10.9MFY2021
- 13.4MFY2022
- 17.2MFY2023
- 14.9MFY2024
- 22.3MFY2025
- 15.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$13.2M88%9 awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs$1.7M11%1 awards
- Offices, Boards and Divisions$79.8K0.5%1 awards
- Defense Health Agency$10K0.1%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$15.1M100.0%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Harford County, MD$4.6M31%
- El Paso County, TX$3.7M25%
- Travis County, TX$1.7M11%
- Monroe County, WI$1.7M11%
- Pulaski County, MO$1.1M7.1%
- Monterey County, CA$858.4K5.7%
- Cumberland County, PA$599.7K4.0%
- Orange County, NY$374.7K2.5%
- 72$325.9K2.2%
- Montgomery County, MD$79.8K0.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition25%US 39% · $3.8M
- Sole-source awards25%US 30% · $3.7M
- Single-offer competitions0.5%US 8.7% · $79.8K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- IMCS IV FORT JOHNSON$14.7M
- E-INVOICING SOLUTION$7.2MDepartment of Veterans Affairs· Travis County, TX· IT & telecom· Apr 29, 2022 – Jun 8, 2026· 36C10A22C0012
- Department of the Army· El Paso County, TX· IT & telecom· May 28, 2025 – Jun 11, 2026· W91RUS25CA024
- Department of the Army· Cumberland County, PA· IT & telecom· May 14, 2024 – May 27, 2026· W91RUS24F0103
- Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· IT & telecom· Feb 12, 2025 – May 14, 2026· W91RUS25F0029
- Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· IT & telecom· Mar 26, 2026 – May 13, 2026· W91RUS26FA036
- Department of the Army· Monterey County, CA· IT & telecom· Feb 25, 2025 – May 26, 2026· W91RUS25FA009
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- STERLING, VA · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- ZANTECH IT SERVICES, INC.$37.2M−24% in FY2026VIENNA, VA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- INTEGRATED SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC$43.3M−43% in FY2026KALISPELL, MT · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.