Federal contractor · DIAMOND BAR, CA

ACACIA7

ACACIA7 received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $35.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.2M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
11%
UEI
U5L6F8C265J5
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3KFY2021
  2. 9.1MFY2022
  3. 5.3MFY2023
  4. 11.8MFY2024
  5. 7.1MFY2025
  6. 2.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2.1M92%
  2. Facilities & utilities$169.1K7.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $249.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions11%
    US 8.8% · $249.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Aleutians West Census Area, AK· Construction & real property· Jul 24, 2024 – May 14, 2026· FA890324F0082
  2. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Construction & real property· Aug 22, 2025 – Apr 17, 2026· FA890325F0179
  3. Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Jan 14, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· FA890326F0019
  4. Department of the Air Force· Santa Barbara County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 8, 2025 – May 4, 2026· FA461025F0183
  5. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2024 – Jun 5, 2026· FA502524FB022
  6. Department of the Army· Los Angeles County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2025 – May 27, 2026· W50S7825FA007
  7. Department of the Air Force· Brevard County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· FA252125F0268
  8. Department of the Air Force· Santa Barbara County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2024 – May 5, 2026· FA461024F0113

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $480.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $458.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $938.7K reported

  1. DENVER, CO · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. IT-OSI-JV, LLC$21.9M+23% in FY2026
    DILLINGHAM, AK · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. X TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$19.4M−79% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LINDE SPECIAL PROJECTS LLC$24.3M−6.2% in FY2026
    NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.