Federal contractor · ASHEVILLE, NC

ACF TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

ACF TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $320.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (+22% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $31M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($164.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$320.2K
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.9%
Single offer
24%
UEI
FLCDDJ375QL1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5MFY2017
  2. 6.9MFY2018
  3. 5MFY2019
  4. 4.8MFY2020
  5. 3MFY2021
  6. 2.5MFY2022
  7. 2.8MFY2023
  8. 442.3KFY2024
  9. 261.4KFY2025
  10. 320.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$244.2K76%
  2. Health & medical$27.6K8.6%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$24.5K7.6%
  4. Equipment maintenance$22.9K7.1%
  5. Professional services$1,0270.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition24%
    US 39% · $78K
  • Sole-source awards0.9%
    US 30% · $2,748
  • Single-offer competitions24%
    US 8.8% · $75.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Yavapai County, AZ· IT & telecom· May 4, 2023 – May 29, 2026· 36C26223C0156
  2. Indian Health Service· McKinley County, NM· IT & telecom· Sep 9, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 75H71026F80082
  3. Indian Health Service· Maricopa County, AZ· IT & telecom· Jul 23, 2020 – Dec 11, 2025· 75H71220F80114
  4. Indian Health Service· Buncombe County, NC· IT & telecom· May 27, 2021 – May 27, 2026· 75H71021P01425
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Buncombe County, NC· Health & medical· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 36C24W26F0040
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Buncombe County, NC· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 14, 2025 – Sep 29, 2026· 36C25626P0091
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Honolulu County, HI· Equipment maintenance· Feb 28, 2025 – Jan 27, 2026· 36C26125F0222
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· DeKalb County, GA· Equipment maintenance· Mar 17, 2025 – Dec 16, 2025· 36C24725F0144

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $38.1K reported

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MESSINA JR, JOHN LOUIS$253.1K−50% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  2. REMOTE-LEARNER US INC.$258.8K−100% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 2 entities · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. VOCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC$198.1K−17% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.