Federal contractor · SAINT CLAIR SHORES, MI

ACP TECHNOLOGIES LLC

ACP TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Since FY2022: $2.1M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($1M).

Obligations · FY2026: $1M
New awards: 1
Sole-source: 0.0%
Single offer: 100%

UEI: CB8HZ4JSURC7

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

123.5KFY2022
1MFY2024
1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Defense Logistics Agency$1M100%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Research & development$1M100%

Where the work was performed

Macomb County, MI$1M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $1M
Sole-source awards0.0%
US 30% · $0
Single-offer competitions100%
US 8.8% · $1M
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

SBIR PHASE II: ACP TECHNOLOGIES PROPOSAL #:L2-0429 PROPOSAL TITLE: "IMPROVED MESOPHASE PITCH PROCESS AND APPLICATIONS" TOPIC #: DLA222-007$2M
Defense Logistics Agency· Macomb County, MI· Research & development· Apr 29, 2024 – Mar 11, 2026· SP470124C0037

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.4M received
FY2022: $0 paid out · $8.4M received
FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.2M received
FY2025: $0 paid out · $8.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $29.4M reported

NATIONAL CENTER FOR MANUFACTURING SCIENCES INC$29.4M
ANN ARBOR, MI · 7 subawards

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

ADVANCED MAGNET LAB, INC.$2M
MELBOURNE, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Scientific research and development services
CERMETECH LLC$2.2M+31% in FY2026
CLEVELAND, OH · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Scientific research and development services
AKUA, INC.$1.8M+57% in FY2026
WOODSIDE, CA · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

ACP Technologies, LLCAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $320K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $970K

Lobbying by year

2023$240K
4 reports
2024$250K
4 reports
2025$320K
4 reports
2026$160K
3 reports

Top issues

Defense15 reports
Economics and economic development8 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES15 reports
U.S. SENATE12 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$920K
14 reports
Greenberg Traurig, LLP$50K
1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

S. 4921 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20252 reports
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2024–2025
H.R. 4016 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
H.R. 8744 · Reducing Administrative Burden for Child Welfare Agencies Act1 report
118th Congress · Introduced · 2024

4 of 15 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.