Federal contractor · DAYTONA BEACH, FL

ADAPTIVEVETS SOLUTIONS, INC

ADAPTIVEVETS SOLUTIONS, INC received $786.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+3.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $10.1M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($786.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$786.5K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PJLRFHY1LLS9
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.1MFY2023
  2. 6.4MFY2024
  3. 761.8KFY2025
  4. 786.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs$786.5K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$786.5K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Arapahoe County, CO$510.5K65%
  2. St. Louis city, MO$173.8K22%
  3. Volusia County, FL$102.2K13%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. NATIONAL SURGERY OFFICE (NSO) WEB TOOLS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND SUPPORT TO VA NSO.$2M
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Arapahoe County, CO· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2023 – Aug 5, 2026· 36C10B23F0354
  2. TRACKING CONTINUING EDUCATION (TRACE) MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT$708.1K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· St. Louis city, MO· IT & telecom· Sep 20, 2023 – Jul 9, 2026· 36C10B23F0330
  3. CAATS SOFTWARE MAINTAINANCE$331.5K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Volusia County, FL· IT & telecom· May 16, 2024 – May 13, 2026· 36C10B24F0147

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $515.3K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $375.7K received
  • FY2023: $358.4K paid out · $512.5K received
  • FY2024: $3.4M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $3.7M reported

  1. ADAPTIVESTACK TECHNOLOGIES INC$3.7M
    DAYTONA BEACH, FL · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.4M reported

  1. CLEAR VANTAGE POINT SOLUTIONS LLC$888.3K
    ANNANDALE, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. B 3 GROUP, LLC$515.3K
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. READY COMPUTING GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS LLC$6.8M−1.8% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
  2. COOPER THOMAS LLC$10.4M−12% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
  3. VECNA TECHNOLOGIES, INC$6.9M−49% in FY2026
    BURLINGTON, MA · 2 entities · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.