Federal contractor · ROCKVILLE, MD

ADVANCED BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, INC.

ADVANCED BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, INC. received $13.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 26 awards (+271% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $190.6M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($13.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.4M
New awards
26
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
33%
UEI
MK4QC9EKZXG8
Parent company
COMPAGNIE MERIEUX ALLIANCE
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BIOFIRE DEFENSE LLC company family: 7 registered entities, $19.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. BIOFIRE DEFENSE LLCSALT LAKE CITY, UT · Family page
    $6.9M
  2. $123.1K
  3. BIOMERIEUX JAPAN LTD.MINATO-KU, JPN
    $104.5K
  4. BIOMERIEUX ITALIA SPABAGNO A RIPOLI, ITA
    $10.1K
  5. SILLIKER, INCCHICAGO, IL
    -$301.2K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 27.1MFY2017
  2. 31.9MFY2018
  3. 35.2MFY2019
  4. 16.6MFY2020
  5. 11.9MFY2021
  6. 8.9MFY2022
  7. 22.4MFY2023
  8. 19.6MFY2024
  9. 3.6MFY2025
  10. 13.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 26 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$13.4M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition33%
    US 39% · $4.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions33%
    US 8.8% · $4.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Aug 23, 2023 – Jun 17, 2026· 75N93023F00001
  2. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Aug 9, 2018 – Mar 30, 2026· 75N93018F00009
  3. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Mar 11, 2024 – Sep 11, 2026· 75N95024F00002
  4. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Apr 30, 2018 – Aug 27, 2026· HHSN27200029
  5. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Jun 29, 2017 – May 26, 2026· HHSN27200007
  6. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Jun 25, 2024 – Aug 4, 2026· 75N93024F00001
  7. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Aug 29, 2024 – Feb 25, 2026· 75N93024F00001
  8. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· May 11, 2022 – Apr 2, 2026· 75N93022F00001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $472.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. URBANA, IL · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $793.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $948.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $582.1K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $472.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

14 companies · $11.9M reported

  1. MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. KINGSTON, NY · 3 subawards
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $3.6M reported

  1. URBANA, IL · 4 subawards
  2. WORCESTER, MA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Warehousing and storage

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 46 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BIOQUAL, INC.$24M−55% in FY2026
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services
  2. RHO FEDERAL SYSTEMS DIVISION INC$33.4M−41% in FY2026
    DURHAM, NC · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development servicesOffice of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response · Scientific research and development services
  3. THERADEX SYSTEMS, INC.$26.3M+2.8% in FY2026
    PRINCETON, NJ · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of BIOFIRE DEFENSE LLC (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • BIOFIRE DEFENSE, LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$420K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$120K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Mr. Philip Maggi$420K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PACs sponsored

  • BIOFIRE DEFENSE, LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.