Federal contractor · SANTA CLARA, CA

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2022: $8.4M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YPJLGM8NML99
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7MFY2022
  2. 1.4MFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $7.6M reported

  1. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$3.9M
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$2.4M
    AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$907.2K
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INSTITUTE OF GAS TECHNOLOGY$1.5M+72% in FY2026
    DES PLAINES, IL · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. WATKINS TECHNICAL SERVICES INC$1.7M−100% in FY2026
    MERIDIANVILLE, AL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. REBELLION DEFENSE, LLC$1.7M
    WASHINGTON, DC · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)AI match · 100%
  • ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$4.9M
21 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$12.8M
$12.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$3,500
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$3.3M
    11 reports
  2. 2024$2.7M
    12 reports
  3. 2025$4.9M
    21 reports
  4. 2026$1.9M
    12 reports

Top issues

  1. Trade (domestic and foreign)47 reports
  2. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code39 reports
  3. Computer industry33 reports
  4. Manufacturing24 reports
  5. Science and technology18 reports
  6. Telecommunications14 reports
  7. Defense8 reports
  8. Budget and appropriations4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES48 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE47 reports
  3. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)39 reports
  4. State - Dept of (DOS)15 reports
  5. Executive Office of the President (EOP)13 reports
  6. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)12 reports
  7. Energy - Dept of11 reports
  8. Treasury - Dept of8 reports
  9. Defense - Dept of (DOD)7 reports
  10. U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)7 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Mehlman Consulting, Inc.$1M
    13 reports
  2. Forbes-Tate$840K
    14 reports
  3. BALLARD PARTNERS$600K
    6 reports
  4. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$290K
    4 reports
  5. J.Sullivan Advocacy$135K
    3 reports
  6. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$80K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$2,50071%
  2. Democratic$1,00029%

PACs sponsored

  • ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. PAC$56.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.