Federal contractor · KIMBERLING CITY, MO

AERO DOCUMENTS, LLC

AERO DOCUMENTS, LLC received $794.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+42% vs FY2025). Since FY2025: $1.4M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($794.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$794.3K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KPYFYV2UWDX3
Small businessWoman-ownedHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 560.4KFY2025
  2. 794.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$794.3K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$794.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Oklahoma County, OK$624K79%
  2. Stone County, MO$170.3K21%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $794.3K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $794.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$794.3K
    Department of Transportation · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. ADD INITIAL FUNDS TO DESIGNATED ENGINEERING REPRESENTATIVE (DER), ENGINEERING SUPPORT AND TRAINING SERVICES$730.7K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Stone County, MO· Professional services· Jun 4, 2025 – May 18, 2026· 6973GH25F00947
  2. PR AC-26-02522 IS TO ESTABLISH OPTION YEAR I DELIVERY ORDER FOR AERO DOCUMENTS LLC IN SUPPORT OF CONTRACT 6973GH-25-D-00040 DER/ENGINEERING TRAINING & SUPPORT SERVICES.$624K
    Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Professional services· Apr 9, 2026 – Apr 9, 2026· 6973GH26F00657

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LWPB, INC.$1.6M−100% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SA.STUDIO, PLLC$2M
    EDMOND, OK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ISA SOFTWARE LLC$2.1M+20,128% in FY2026
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.