Federal contractor · WEST SACRAMENTO, CA
AEROSPACE FACILITIES GROUP, INC.
AEROSPACE FACILITIES GROUP, INC. received $455.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−24% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $14.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($489.5K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $455.1K
- New awards
- 10
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 18%
- UEI
- FA4ARRRHTKN7
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.3MFY2017
- 1.9MFY2018
- 1.5MFY2019
- 1.4MFY2020
- 1.8MFY2021
- 2.2MFY2022
- 1.5MFY2023
- 1.3MFY2024
- 595.9KFY2025
- 455.1KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$489.5K100%8 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard-$34.4K0.0%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$426.7K87%
- Professional services$62.9K13%
Where the work was performed
- Maricopa County, AZ$301.7K66%
- Sumter County, SC$128.7K28%
- Bay County, FL$114.1K25%
- Okaloosa County, FL$82.3K18%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$4,500
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · -$86.8K
- Single-offer competitions18%US 8.7% · $82.3K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Bay County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Jan 19, 2022 – Apr 28, 2026· FA481922C0007
- Department of the Air Force· Sumter County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Feb 10, 2023 – Mar 3, 2026· FA480323P0006
- Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Apr 21, 2022 – May 14, 2026· FA282322C0011
- Department of the Air Force· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Oct 27, 2021 – Feb 10, 2026· FA488722C0006
- Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 30, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· FA441724P0130
- Department of the Air Force· Maricopa County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Oct 14, 2025 – Oct 14, 2025· FA488726P0002
- Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Mar 17, 2022 – May 26, 2026· FA468622P0007
- Department of the Air Force· Taylor County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Sep 30, 2020 – Dec 15, 2025· FA466120C0024
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SYTEK AUTOMATION LLC$1.6M+28% in FY2026SOUTH SALT LAKE, UT · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
- SCHMITT + SOHN AUFZUEGE GMBH & CO. KG$1.7M−32% in FY2026LUDWIGSHAFEN AM RHEIN, DEU · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenanceArmy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
- FEDERAL INTEGRATION TEAM, INC.$1.7M+13% in FY2026FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.