Federal contractor · OAK RIDGE, TN

AEROSTAR ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION LLC

AEROSTAR ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION LLC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−95% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $113.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($936K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
10
Sole-source
92%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FN96DCLENNH8
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.5MFY2020
  2. 3.3MFY2021
  3. 22.2MFY2022
  4. 21.5MFY2023
  5. 36.1MFY2024
  6. 24.6MFY2025
  7. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.1M94%
  2. Professional services$43K3.6%
  3. Construction & real property$30K2.5%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition92%
    US 39% · $1.1M
  • Sole-source awards92%
    US 30% · $1.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Iosco County, MI· Professional services· Sep 28, 2022 – Mar 13, 2026· FA890322C0009
  2. Department of the Army· Anderson County, TN· Facilities & utilities· May 2, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· W912BV25FA007
  3. Department of the Army· Wichita County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2024 – Apr 20, 2026· W9128F24F0235
  4. Department of the Navy· Harrison County, MS· Facilities & utilities· May 11, 2026 – May 11, 2026· N6945026F0259
  5. Department of the Army· Dutchess County, NY· Construction & real property· Apr 12, 2024 – Dec 8, 2025· W912DQ24C3002
  6. Department of the Army· Kitsap County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2022 – Mar 4, 2026· W912DQ22C3008
  7. Department of Energy· Knox County, TN· Professional services· Jun 2, 2025 – May 1, 2026· 89303025CIE000005
  8. Department of the Army· Knox County, TN· Professional services· May 27, 2025 – Jan 8, 2026· W9128F25FA046

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $143K reported

  1. WEST CHESTER, PA · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FPM REMEDIATIONS, INC.$53.7M−57% in FY2026
    ONEIDA, NY · 8 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Remediation and other waste management servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. AHTNA-ARCADIS 8(A) JV, LLC$28.7M−116% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. FPM-AECOM JV1$76.8M−51% in FY2026
    ONEIDA, NY · 2 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.