Federal contractor · OAK RIDGE, TN
AEROSTAR ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION LLC
AEROSTAR ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION LLC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−95% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $113.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($936K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.2M
- New awards
- 10
- Sole-source
- 92%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- FN96DCLENNH8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 4.5MFY2020
- 3.3MFY2021
- 22.2MFY2022
- 21.5MFY2023
- 36.1MFY2024
- 24.6MFY2025
- 1.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$936K78%1 awards
- Department of the Army$223.3K19%7 awards
- Department of the Air Force$43K3.6%1 awards
- Department of Energy$00.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$1.1M94%
- Professional services$43K3.6%
- Construction & real property$30K2.5%
Where the work was performed
- Harrison County, MS$936K78%
- Wichita County, TX$100.5K8.4%
- Kitsap County, WA$92.8K7.7%
- Iosco County, MI$43K3.6%
- Dutchess County, NY$30K2.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition92%US 39% · $1.1M
- Sole-source awards92%US 30% · $1.1M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Iosco County, MI· Professional services· Sep 28, 2022 – Mar 13, 2026· FA890322C0009
- Department of the Army· Anderson County, TN· Facilities & utilities· May 2, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· W912BV25FA007
- Department of the Army· Wichita County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2024 – Apr 20, 2026· W9128F24F0235
- Department of the Navy· Harrison County, MS· Facilities & utilities· May 11, 2026 – May 11, 2026· N6945026F0259
- Department of the Army· Dutchess County, NY· Construction & real property· Apr 12, 2024 – Dec 8, 2025· W912DQ24C3002
- MANCHESTER I&M BASE PERIOD$630.5KDepartment of the Army· Kitsap County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2022 – Mar 4, 2026· W912DQ22C3008
- Department of Energy· Knox County, TN· Professional services· Jun 2, 2025 – May 1, 2026· 89303025CIE000005
- Department of the Army· Knox County, TN· Professional services· May 27, 2025 – Jan 8, 2026· W9128F25FA046
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $143K reported
- WESTON SOLUTIONS INC$143KWEST CHESTER, PA · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- FPM REMEDIATIONS, INC.$53.7M−57% in FY2026ONEIDA, NY · 8 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Remediation and other waste management servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
- AHTNA-ARCADIS 8(A) JV, LLC$28.7M−116% in FY2026ANCHORAGE, AK · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
- FPM-AECOM JV1$76.8M−51% in FY2026ONEIDA, NY · 2 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.