Federal contractor · NEWPORT NEWS, VA

AH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC

AH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC received $5.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 32 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $33.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($4.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.5M
New awards
32
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
14%
UEI
N2RDKG84ZR98
Parent company
AH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.7MFY2017
  2. 2.7MFY2018
  3. 1.7MFY2019
  4. 1.5MFY2020
  5. 3.1MFY2021
  6. 1.3MFY2022
  7. 5.3MFY2023
  8. 2.7MFY2024
  9. 8.2MFY2025
  10. 5.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 30 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$5.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1.5M27%
  2. Norfolk city, VA$438.4K8.0%
  3. United States$172.3K3.2%
  4. Lake County, IL$147.6K2.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition14%
    US 39% · $783.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.7% · $783.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Baltimore city, MD· Construction & real property· Sep 13, 2023 – Feb 4, 2026· W912DR23F0273
  2. Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Mar 5, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· N6247026F0025
  3. Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Jan 14, 2025 – Apr 1, 2026· N6247025F4099
  4. Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W912DR26FA102
  5. Department of the Navy· Onslow County, NC· Construction & real property· May 14, 2025 – May 5, 2026· N4008525F4477
  6. Department of the Navy· Tarrant County, TX· Construction & real property· May 29, 2025 – Mar 5, 2026· N6945025F0414
  7. Department of the Navy· Onslow County, NC· Construction & real property· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· N4008526F0467
  8. Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Jan 29, 2026 – Jan 29, 2026· N6274226F0202

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $81.5K reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC$16.5M−66% in FY2026
    SPRINGFIELD, IL · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ZEKIAH TECHNOLOGIES INC$15.2M+35% in FY2026
    LA PLATA, MD · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. AH/BC NAVY JV, LLC$15.4M−100% in FY2026
    NEWPORT NEWS, VA · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.