Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
ALASKA CHADUX NETWORK
ALASKA CHADUX NETWORK received $162.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−70% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.5M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($156.7K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $162.7K
- New awards
- 4
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- LLJPNRDFK8N5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 80.8KFY2017
- 4.4MFY2018
- 169.5KFY2019
- 132KFY2020
- 17.7KFY2024
- 536.7KFY2025
- 162.7KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- U.S. Coast Guard$156.7K96%3 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$162.7K100%
Where the work was performed
- Bethel Census Area, AK$83.8K51%
- Anchorage Municipality, AK$79K49%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $162.7K
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $162.7K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications96%US 5.1% · $156.7K
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- U.S. Coast Guard$156.7KDepartment of Homeland Security · 3 awards
Largest awards
- U.S. Coast Guard· Bethel Census Area, AK· Facilities & utilities· Oct 24, 2025 – Jan 13, 2026· 70Z08426FKETC0003
- U.S. Coast Guard· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Jun 3, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 70Z08426FKETC0017
- NOAA SHORE SIDE STAFF OFFICES NON-FORECASTED CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICES AND SUPPLIES.$10.5KNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Feb 14, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· 1333MK25P0064
- U.S. Coast Guard· Chugach Census Area, AK· Facilities & utilities· Jan 21, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· 70Z08426FKETC0011
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- STREAM TECH INC$746.6KHOUSTON, TX · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Remediation and other waste management services
- LAREDO CONSTRUCTION, INC$530.9K+618% in FY2026STAFFORD, TX · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Remediation and other waste management services
- PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION$877.6K+322% in FY2026HONOLULU, HI · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Remediation and other waste management services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Lobbying and PAC activity
Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.
Matched organizations
- Alaska Chadux NetworkAI match · 100%
- Lobbying · 2025
- $200K
- 9 reports
- Lobbying · 2023–2026
- $400K
Lobbying by year
- 2023$40K4 reports
- 2024$40K4 reports
- 2025$200K9 reports
- 2026$120K5 reports
Top issues
- Marine, maritime, boating and fisheries21 reports
- Budget and appropriations6 reports
Who was contacted
- U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES21 reports
- U.S. SENATE21 reports
- U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)15 reports
Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).
Lobbying firms hired
- ACCELERATE STRATEGIES$180K6 reports
- Smith Advocacy Group, LLC$140K7 reports
- FBB Federal Relations$80K9 reports
Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.
Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.
Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.
Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.
Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.