Federal contractor · PORT TOWNSEND, WA

ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY

No contract obligations recorded for ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY in FY2026. Since FY2017: $263.4K. It also received $34.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
EBRNMS2NXSL5
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ALASKA POWER & TELEPHONE COMPANY company family: 4 registered entities, $96.6K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ALASKA POWER & TELEPHONE COMPANYTOK, AK · Family page
    $0
  2. $96.6K
  3. ALASKA POWER COMPANYPORT TOWNSEND, WA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 20.7KFY2017
  2. 44.2KFY2021
  3. 99.1KFY2022
  4. 55.9KFY2023
  5. 55.9KFY2024
  6. -12.4KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY received $34.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 21 actions (7 new awards), +235% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 10.855 · Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants ($33M).

Assistance · FY2026
$34.1M
New awards
7
Actions
21
Since FY2021
$17.4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.3MFY2021
  2. -31.5MFY2022
  3. 1.8MFY2023
  4. 1.5MFY2024
  5. 10.2MFY2025
  6. 34.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$33M97%
  2. Direct payments$1.1M3.2%

Top programs

  1. 10.855 · Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants$33M97%
  2. 32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost$807.8K2.4%
  3. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries$169.3K0.5%
  4. 32.003 · Universal Service Fund - Lifeline$101.5K0.3%

Awarding agencies

  1. Rural Utilities Service$33M97%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 10.855 · Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants· Rural Utilities Service· Project grant· May 6, 2026 – May 6, 2026· CLSS00000118399
  2. 32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Oct 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2026· HC-143002699-613017-CAFICC
  3. 32.003 · Universal Service Fund - Lifeline· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Nov 1, 2020 – Aug 31, 2026· LI-143002699-613017
  4. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2699021564
  5. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· SL-2699001680
  6. 32.004 · Universal Service Fund - Schools and Libraries· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Sep 30, 2026 – Sep 30, 2026· SL-2699023525

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $258.9K reported

  1. ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY$258.9K
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MATANUSKA TELECOM ASSOCIATION INC$157.9K−19% in FY2026
    PALMER, AK · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. ALBION, ID · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Wired telecommunications carriers
  3. MILLENNIUM NETWORKS LLC$136.6K−100% in FY2026
    FREEDOM, WY · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Wired telecommunications carriers

Showing the top 3 of 10 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.