Federal contractor · PORT ALLEN, LA

ALEUT TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC

ALEUT TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC received $6.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+87% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $27.3M. Its largest customer was Environmental Protection Agency ($5.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.7M
New awards
9
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ZKLNBN9CHHU6
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $7M in FY2026 together.

  1. ALEUT TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLCPORT ALLEN, LA · Family page
    $6.7M
  2. ALEUT SERVICES, LLCPORT ALLEN, LA
    $314.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 172KFY2021
  2. 5MFY2022
  3. 6.4MFY2023
  4. 5.6MFY2024
  5. 3.6MFY2025
  6. 6.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$5.5M83%
  2. Professional services$1.1M17%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $6.7M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $6.7M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Environmental Protection Agency · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 26, 2024 – May 20, 2026· 68HE0624F0029
  2. Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 26, 2024 – May 29, 2026· 68HE0624F0030
  3. Department of Energy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jan 31, 2025 – Aug 3, 2026· 89303025CHC000021
  4. Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· 68HE0624F0031
  5. Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 20, 2023 – Mar 30, 2026· 68HE0723F0071
  6. Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· May 31, 2023 – Mar 2, 2026· 68HE0723F0070
  7. Department of the Army· West Baton Rouge Parish, LA· Professional services· Feb 7, 2024 – Feb 5, 2026· W912HQ24C0032
  8. Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 68HE0626F0031

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $3.5M reported

  1. FREDERICK, MD · 2 subawards · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AUSTIN, TX · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SILVER SPRING, MD · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC$20.1M−66% in FY2026
    CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.