Federal contractor · HOUSTON, TX

ALS SERVICES USA, CORP.

ALS SERVICES USA, CORP. received $93K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($93K).

Obligations · FY2026
$93K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PN7TWXPK66L8
Parent company
ALS LIMITED
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

8 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $198.5K in FY2026 together.

  1. ALS SERVICES USA, CORP.HOUSTON, TX · Family page
    $93K
  2. ALS GROUP USA, CORP.SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $87K
  3. ALS GROUP USA CORPMIDDLETOWN, PA
    $18.5K
  4. ALS CANADA LTD.NORTH VANCOUVER, CAN
    $0
  5. $0
  6. ALS GROUP USA, CORP.FORT COLLINS, CO
    $0
  7. ALS GROUP USA, CORP.JACKSONVILLE, FL
    $0
  8. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 237.9KFY2017
  2. 292.4KFY2018
  3. 370.3KFY2019
  4. 457.1KFY2020
  5. 299.8KFY2021
  6. 125KFY2022
  7. 313KFY2023
  8. 298KFY2024
  9. 513KFY2025
  10. 93KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$93K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Exclusions in SAM.gov

Records of the SAM.gov exclusions list (parties debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment or otherwise excluded) matched to this recipient by its Unique Entity ID or CAGE code.

  • Suspended or proposed for debarment
    Listed
    Excluding agency
    Environmental Protection Agency
    In effect from
    Jun 1, 2026 – Indefinite
    Program
    Reciprocal
    Matched by
    Unique Entity ID
    SAM.gov record

SAM.gov lists what agencies report, and only exclusions in effect: those that ended are known from twice-yearly snapshots, so an end date is approximate. Agencies may award to an excluded party with a documented compelling reason. An exclusion is an administrative measure, not a conviction.

Source: Exclusions (debarred, suspended and otherwise excluded parties) (U.S. General Services Administration, SAM.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Exclusions as listed on Oct 8, 2026, history from Apr 28, 2022.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Harris County, TX· Professional services· Feb 13, 2026 – Feb 13, 2026· N6449826F0019
  2. Department of the Navy· Harris County, TX· Professional services· Jul 25, 2024 – Mar 10, 2026· N6449824F4252

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

15 companies · $12.6M reported

  1. LYNCHBURG, VA · 3 subawards · Waste treatment and disposal
  2. GERMANTOWN, MD · 11 subawards
  3. GREENVILLE, SC · 3 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, LLC$575.7K−100% in FY2026
    FULLERTON, CA · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PENSACOLA, FL · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LOGISTICS SUPPORT INCORPORATED$808.1K−100% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.