Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

ALUTIIQ BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

ALUTIIQ BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC received $694.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($694.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$694.1K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GJKZD9ZEAEJ6
Parent company
AFOGNAK NATIVE CORP
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the "ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC" company family: 35 registered entities, $79M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $27.2M
  2. $46.1M
  3. $5.2M
  4. $1,806
  5. A2 RESEARCH, JVHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -307.6KFY2017
  2. -114.9KFY2018
  3. -354KFY2019
  4. 614.5KFY2020
  5. 474.1KFY2021
  6. 2.1MFY2022
  7. 2MFY2023
  8. 583KFY2024
  9. 1.7MFY2025
  10. 694.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$694.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Sarpy County, NE$694.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Sarpy County, NE· Professional services· Mar 24, 2022 – Mar 4, 2026· FA460022F0035

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $153.6K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $4.8M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

217 companies · $317.5M reported

  1. AUSTIN, TX · 19 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. MILES RESOURCES LLC$31.2M
    PUYALLUP, WA · 29 subawards · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  3. AIEA, HI · 3 subawards · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $73.9M reported

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 17 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. KODIAK, AK · 31 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. PUYALLUP, WA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 32 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NAKUPUNA SOLUTIONS, LLC$315.2M−26% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support servicesState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MEC ENERGY SERVICES LLC$143.6M−18% in FY2026
    NEW TOWN, ND · 2 entities · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesState · Facilities support servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TUVLI LLC$185.8M−16% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesState · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.