Federal contractor · AZTEC, NM

ALWAYS PROFESSIONAL INC

ALWAYS PROFESSIONAL INC received $184.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−70% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.8M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($184.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$184.8K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
51%
UEI
DKJRGJWCLLN7
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2017
  2. 936.1KFY2018
  3. 975.7KFY2019
  4. 780.4KFY2020
  5. 387.4KFY2021
  6. 612.5KFY2022
  7. 712.5KFY2023
  8. 106.4KFY2024
  9. 622.3KFY2025
  10. 184.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Indian Health Service$184.8K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$95.2K51%
  2. Professional services$89.6K49%

Where the work was performed

  1. Taos County, NM$95.2K51%
  2. Santa Fe County, NM$72.6K39%
  3. Rio Arriba County, NM$17K9.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition51%
    US 39% · $95.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions51%
    US 8.8% · $95.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TWO (2) SECURITY GUARDS SERVICES FOR THE SANTA FE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER.$697.3K
    Indian Health Service· Santa Fe County, NM· Professional services· May 20, 2024 – Sep 9, 2026· 75H70724C00006
  2. SECURITY GUARD SERVICES - JSU$347.5K
    Indian Health Service· Rio Arriba County, NM· Professional services· Aug 31, 2021 – Sep 2, 2026· 75H70721P00186
  3. SECURITY GUARD NON PERSONAL SERVICES AT TPSU$284.4K
    Indian Health Service· Taos County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Oct 9, 2024 – Aug 7, 2026· 75H70725P00008

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $158.9K (3 subawards)

1 prime

  1. JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO.$158.9K100%
    DALLAS, TX · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · -$31.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $131K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $158.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $258.8K reported

  1. CH2M HILL, INC$258.8K
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 6 subawards · Utility system construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAKOM NETANAK LLC$533.2K−24% in FY2026
    SHAWANO, WI · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Investigation and security services
  2. RF TECHNOLOGIES INC$1.5M−74% in FY2026
    BROOKFIELD, WI · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Investigation and security services
  3. IRON HORSE SECURITY, LLC$2.2M−9.5% in FY2026
    TULSA, OK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.