Federal contractor · GINOWAN
AMERICAN ENGINEERING CORPORATION
AMERICAN ENGINEERING CORPORATION received $88.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 173 awards (−43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.4B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($49.3M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $88.6M
- New awards
- 173
- Sole-source
- 3.8%
- Single offer
- 10%
- UEI
- M336EV5K3YZ3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 76.9MFY2017
- 89.4MFY2018
- 108.5MFY2019
- 103.2MFY2020
- 118.7MFY2021
- 197.2MFY2022
- 230.8MFY2023
- 190.7MFY2024
- 155.9MFY2025
- 88.6MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$49.3M56%60 awards
- Department of the Navy$31.4M35%82 awards
- 21 awards
- Department of the Army$1.6M1.8%10 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$62.9M71%
- Equipment maintenance$21.2M24%
- Facilities & utilities$4.5M5.1%
- Other equipment & supplies$32K0.0%
- Professional services$16.9K0.0%
Where the work was performed
- Abroad$88.1M99%
- United States$481K0.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition14%US 39% · $12.6M
- Sole-source awards3.8%US 30% · $3.3M
- Single-offer competitions10%US 8.7% · $9.3M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 2 awards
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Mar 27, 2024 – Apr 27, 2026· FA520924F0096
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2021 – May 27, 2026· FA520521C0007
- FY23 FUNDING$10.6M
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $226.8K (2 subawards)
2 primes
- SIEMENS GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC$148.7K66%ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
- IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC.$78.1K34%MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $483.3K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $11.1M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $605.9K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $5.2M received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $226.8K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
11 companies · $19.1M reported
- RESTON, VA · 11 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
- CENTREVILLE, VA · 1 subaward · Investigation and security services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 52 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SEA PAC ENGINEERING INC$271.5M−78% in FY2026LOS ANGELES, CA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction
- MVL-BROMGROVE JV LLC$150.4M−56% in FY2026LANSING, MI · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Nonresidential building construction
- SHAPE CONSTRUCTION INC$143.7M−86% in FY2026POULSBO, WA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.