Federal contractor · PORTER RANCH, CA

AMERICAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.

AMERICAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. received $5.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−24% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $58.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($5.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.6M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DWCNCQZS9PL3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.2MFY2017
  2. 6.6MFY2018
  3. 5.7MFY2019
  4. 6.5MFY2020
  5. 5.7MFY2021
  6. 6.6MFY2022
  7. 5.3MFY2023
  8. 4.9MFY2024
  9. 7.4MFY2025
  10. 5.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$5.6M100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$5.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Riverside County, CA$5.6M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOCUSED ON THE AREAS OF METROLOGY, TEST AND MONITORING SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION ASSURANCE SUPPORT.$18.3M
    Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· Apr 21, 2023 – Mar 9, 2026· N6426723F3002
  2. ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOCUSED ON THE AREAS OF METROLOGY, TEST AND MONITORING SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION ASSURANCE SUPPORT.$5.3M
    Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· Apr 20, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· N6426726F3004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $85K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. PANTEXAS DETERRENCE, LLC$85K100%
    LYNCHBURG, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $75K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $85.2K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $575.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $180.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $85K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1M reported

  1. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$833.7K
    FREDERICK, MD · 6 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. PANTEXAS DETERRENCE, LLC$167.6K
    LYNCHBURG, VA · 2 subawards · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. M&N-BMCD LANT SIOP JV$17.9M
    NORFOLK, VA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HELBER HASTERT & FEE PLANNERS INC$17.8M−94% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RLF AND SHERLOCK SMITH AND ADAMS JV$18.5M−14% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.