Federal contractor · ALACHUA, FL
ANAMAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.
ANAMAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. received $674.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($674.5K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $674.5K
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- GL1VHBG78KF5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2.1MFY2017
- 2.2MFY2018
- 2.4MFY2019
- 2.2MFY2020
- 2.1MFY2021
- 2.1MFY2022
- 2.3MFY2023
- 1.8MFY2024
- 3.7MFY2025
- 674.5KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$674.5K100%6 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$626.3K93%
- Professional services$48.2K7.1%
Where the work was performed
- Matagorda County, TX$434.9K64%
- Multnomah County, OR$428.2K63%
- Jefferson County, TX$191.4K28%
- Pierce County, WA$134.5K20%
- Skagit County, WA$96.7K14%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$183.1K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · -$183.1K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Alachua County, FL· Professional services· Jan 31, 2025 – Mar 26, 2026· W912EP25F0040
- Department of the Army· Matagorda County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 9, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· W912HY26FA003
- Department of the Army· Multnomah County, OR· Professional services· Oct 3, 2025 – Oct 3, 2025· W9127N26FA001
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· W912HY26FA023
- Department of the Army· Pierce County, WA· Professional services· Jan 8, 2026 – Jan 8, 2026· W912DW26FA015
- Department of the Army· Skagit County, WA· Professional services· Feb 24, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· W912DW26FA021
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $1.5M paid out · $0 received
- FY2022: $867.7K paid out · $0 received
- FY2023: $1.6M paid out · $0 received
- FY2024: $1.1M paid out · $0 received
- FY2025: $1.9M paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
14 companies · $6.9M reported
- CONROE, TX · 16 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- LLOYD ENGINEERING, INC$1.7MBELLAIRE, TX · 19 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ECO ANALYSTS, LLC$916.1KMOSCOW, ID · 8 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MAXMED SARATOGA JV LLC$6.1M−45% in FY2026SAN ANTONIO, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- WILSON PERUMAL & COMPANY, LLC$6M−57% in FY2026DALLAS, TX · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- WHITETAIL AYUDA JOINT VENTURE LLC$6.3M−100% in FY2026JAY, OK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.