Federal contractor · ALACHUA, FL

ANAMAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.

ANAMAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. received $674.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($674.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$674.5K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GL1VHBG78KF5
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.1MFY2017
  2. 2.2MFY2018
  3. 2.4MFY2019
  4. 2.2MFY2020
  5. 2.1MFY2021
  6. 2.1MFY2022
  7. 2.3MFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 3.7MFY2025
  10. 674.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$626.3K93%
  2. Professional services$48.2K7.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$183.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$183.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Alachua County, FL· Professional services· Jan 31, 2025 – Mar 26, 2026· W912EP25F0040
  2. Department of the Army· Matagorda County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 9, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· W912HY26FA003
  3. Department of the Army· Multnomah County, OR· Professional services· Oct 3, 2025 – Oct 3, 2025· W9127N26FA001
  4. Department of the Army· Jefferson County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· W912HY26FA023
  5. Department of the Army· Pierce County, WA· Professional services· Jan 8, 2026 – Jan 8, 2026· W912DW26FA015
  6. Department of the Army· Skagit County, WA· Professional services· Feb 24, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· W912DW26FA021

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $867.7K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $1.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $1.9M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

14 companies · $6.9M reported

  1. CONROE, TX · 16 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. LLOYD ENGINEERING, INC$1.7M
    BELLAIRE, TX · 19 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. MOSCOW, ID · 8 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAXMED SARATOGA JV LLC$6.1M−45% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. DALLAS, TX · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. WHITETAIL AYUDA JOINT VENTURE LLC$6.3M−100% in FY2026
    JAY, OK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.