Federal contractor · GOLDEN, CO
ANDERSON HALLAS ARCHITECTS, PC
ANDERSON HALLAS ARCHITECTS, PC received $2.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 35 awards (−64% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $46.8M. Its largest customer was National Park Service ($2.8M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.8M
- New awards
- 35
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 100%
- UEI
- MSKNDNL66WB5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2MFY2017
- 787.5KFY2018
- 3.8MFY2019
- 8.3MFY2020
- 6MFY2021
- 6.1MFY2022
- 3.5MFY2023
- 5.6MFY2024
- 7.8MFY2025
- 2.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- National Park Service$2.8M100%35 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$2.8M100%
Where the work was performed
- Mariposa County, CA$778.8K27%
- Jefferson County, CO$484K17%
- Bayfield County, WI$392.7K14%
- Clark County, NV$334.7K12%
- Hawaii County, HI$209.6K7.4%
- Santa Cruz County, AZ$209.3K7.4%
- Butte County, ID$172.2K6.1%
- San Francisco County, CA$144.5K5.1%
- White Pine County, NV$83.9K3.0%
- Clark County, WA$74.9K2.6%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $2.9M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions100%US 8.7% · $2.9M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- National Park Service· Mariposa County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 8, 2025 – Aug 13, 2026· 140P8525F0106
- National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2024 – May 30, 2026· 140P2024F0397
- National Park Service· Mariposa County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 27, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026· 140P8526F0058
- National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2025 – Aug 13, 2026· 140P2025F0296
- National Park Service· Tulare County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 24, 2024 – Apr 23, 2026· 140P2024F0441
- National Park Service· Shasta County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· 140P8525F0084
- National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Jul 24, 2025 – May 8, 2026· 140P2025F0243
- National Park Service· Bayfield County, WI· Construction & real property· Aug 7, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026· 140P2026F0201
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $52.8K (1 subaward)
1 prime
- HDR ARCHITECTURE, INC.$52.8K100%OMAHA, NE · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $291.4K received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $52.8K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $344.2K reported
- DENVER, CO · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- ENGLEWOOD, CO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- DHM DESIGN CORPORATION$17.6M+61% in FY2026DENVER, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- CROFT AND ASSOCIATES, INC.$13.8M−61% in FY2026KENNESAW, GA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- HENNEBERY EDDY ARCHITECTS, INC.$11.4M−73% in FY2026PORTLAND, OR · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.