Federal contractor · GOLDEN, CO

ANDERSON HALLAS ARCHITECTS, PC

ANDERSON HALLAS ARCHITECTS, PC received $2.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 35 awards (−64% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $46.8M. Its largest customer was National Park Service ($2.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.8M
New awards
35
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MSKNDNL66WB5
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2MFY2017
  2. 787.5KFY2018
  3. 3.8MFY2019
  4. 8.3MFY2020
  5. 6MFY2021
  6. 6.1MFY2022
  7. 3.5MFY2023
  8. 5.6MFY2024
  9. 7.8MFY2025
  10. 2.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 35 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Butte County, ID$172.2K6.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.9M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $2.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Park Service· Mariposa County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 8, 2025 – Aug 13, 2026· 140P8525F0106
  2. National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2024 – May 30, 2026· 140P2024F0397
  3. National Park Service· Mariposa County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 27, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026· 140P8526F0058
  4. National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2025 – Aug 13, 2026· 140P2025F0296
  5. National Park Service· Tulare County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 24, 2024 – Apr 23, 2026· 140P2024F0441
  6. National Park Service· Shasta County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· 140P8525F0084
  7. National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Jul 24, 2025 – May 8, 2026· 140P2025F0243
  8. National Park Service· Bayfield County, WI· Construction & real property· Aug 7, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026· 140P2026F0201

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $52.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. OMAHA, NE · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $291.4K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $52.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $344.2K reported

  1. DENVER, CO · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DHM DESIGN CORPORATION$17.6M+61% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CROFT AND ASSOCIATES, INC.$13.8M−61% in FY2026
    KENNESAW, GA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HENNEBERY EDDY ARCHITECTS, INC.$11.4M−73% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, OR · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.