Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ

ANDREWS PLUMBING SERVICES INC

ANDREWS PLUMBING SERVICES INC received $734.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−46% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $3M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($734.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$734.2K
New awards
8
Sole-source
79%
Single offer
21%
UEI
LYCFQ39L7MK3
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 24KFY2020
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 32.6KFY2023
  4. 816.5KFY2024
  5. 1.4MFY2025
  6. 734.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$495.1K67%
  2. Construction & real property$239.1K33%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $734.2K
  • Sole-source awards79%
    US 30% · $576.8K
  • Single-offer competitions21%
    US 8.7% · $157.4K
  • Urgency justifications40%
    US 5.1% · $290.4K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2025 – Apr 8, 2026· 36C26225P2264
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Jul 10, 2026 – Jul 10, 2026· 36C26226P1252
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Aug 25, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026· 36C26226P1502
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Jan 10, 2025 – Aug 13, 2026· 36C26225C0109
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Mar 20, 2026 – May 27, 2026· 36C26226P0677
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Feb 4, 2026 – Jun 17, 2026· 36C26226P0457
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Jun 9, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· 36C26226C0209
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 36C26226P1512

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $162.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $71.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $233.4K reported

  1. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 4 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Nonresidential building constructionVeterans Affairs · Building equipment contractors
  2. CHEEKTOWAGA, NY · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Nonresidential building constructionVeterans Affairs · Building equipment contractors
  3. GC JOINT VENTURE$2.3M+99% in FY2026
    ESSEX, MD · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Nonresidential building constructionVeterans Affairs · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.