Federal contractor · LOS ANGELES, CA
ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC
ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC received $541.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.5M. Its largest customer was Federal Transit Administration ($541.1K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $541.1K
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- FPNCJD9P3QR4
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.4MFY2017
- 75.4KFY2018
- 1MFY2019
- 1.3MFY2020
- 1.3MFY2021
- 479.6KFY2022
- 1.3MFY2023
- 385.7KFY2024
- 1.7MFY2025
- 541.1KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Federal Transit Administration$541.1K100%6 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$541.1K100%
Where the work was performed
- Los Angeles County, CA$541.1K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$161.3K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · -$161.3K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Sep 20, 2024 – Oct 20, 2025· 69319524F30132N
- Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Apr 28, 2026 – Aug 21, 2026· 69319526F30004N
- Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Sep 30, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025· 69319525F30150N
- Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Sep 24, 2019 – Sep 22, 2026· 69319519F300123
- Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Mar 20, 2020 – Sep 22, 2026· 69319520F300032
- Federal Transit Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Jun 28, 2022 – Jun 4, 2026· 69319522F30024N
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- THE MCKISSACK GROUP, INC.$2.7M−53% in FY2026NEW YORK, NY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Transit Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ENVISION CONSULTANTS, LTD.$2.7M+169% in FY2026MULLICA HILL, NJ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Transit Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- MILLIGAN CONSULTING, LLC$2.7M−106% in FY2026PHILADELPHIA, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Transit Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.