Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

ANIXTER INC.

ANIXTER INC. received $6,829 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−79% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($6,829).

Obligations · FY2026
$6,829
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
FDJFUMFC3BK3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ACCU-TECH CORPORATION company family: 42 registered entities, $2.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ACCU-TECH CORPORATIONALPHARETTA, GA · Family page
    $55.2K
  2. $2M
  3. ANIXTER INCGLENVIEW, IL
    $83.3K
  4. ANIXTER INC.METAIRIE, LA
    $58.3K
  5. $9,234

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 154.7KFY2017
  2. 232.2KFY2018
  3. 55.8KFY2019
  4. 75.5KFY2020
  5. 311.6FY2021
  6. 1.4MFY2022
  7. -214.2KFY2023
  8. -118.2KFY2024
  9. 32.6KFY2025
  10. 6.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$6,829100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $6,829
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $6,829
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Accomack County, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 11, 2026 – Mar 11, 2026· N0002426FG198
  2. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 15, 2025 – Dec 15, 2025· N0002426FG147

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $486 received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $116.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $375.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $214.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $157.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

50 companies · $1.8B reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 429 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 30 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TYSONS, VA · 45 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 38 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ELK MOUNTAIN TECHNOLOGY LLC$2.3M−92% in FY2026
    ASPEN, CO · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. VERO BEACH, FL · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. ELTA NORTH AMERICA INC.$2.1M−102% in FY2026
    ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.