Federal contractor · FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA

ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC

ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC received -$29K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−116% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6M. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$29K
New awards
5
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
WMTJS85D4X19
Parent company
MARS, INCORPORATED
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY US, LLC company family: 10 registered entities, $781.4K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY US, LLCHACKETTSTOWN, NJ · Family page
    $819.1K
  2. HESKA CORPORATIONLOVELAND, CO
    $0
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 119.3KFY2017
  2. 149.8KFY2018
  3. 123.6KFY2019
  4. 147.3KFY2020
  5. 177.8KFY2021
  6. 249.6KFY2022
  7. 306.8KFY2023
  8. 127.4KFY2024
  9. 177.8KFY2025
  10. -29KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$73.1K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 75N98026P01316
  2. National Institutes of Health· Orange County, CA· Health & medical· Dec 29, 2020 – Aug 24, 2026· 75N93021P00190
  3. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· El Paso County, TX· Health & medical· Sep 29, 2025 – Jan 12, 2026· 70B06C25P00000550
  4. National Institutes of Health· Orange County, CA· Health & medical· Jul 21, 2022 – Apr 24, 2026· 75N93022P00860
  5. National Institutes of Health· Orange County, CA· Health & medical· Jun 17, 2021 – May 21, 2026· 75N93021P00832

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $30.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MENLO PARK, CA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $64K reported

  1. MILWAUKEE, WI · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. MENLO PARK, CA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BALTIMORE, MD · 9.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CHEMOGENICS BIOPHARMA, LLC$341K−100% in FY2026
    DURHAM, NC · 9.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. PHARMARON, INC$212.7K−667% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, KY · 9.3% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY US, LLC (10 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Mars, IncorporatedAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.2M
18 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$5.8M
$5.8M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.9M
    22 reports
  2. 2024$2M
    22 reports
  3. 2025$1.2M
    18 reports
  4. 2026$680K
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Trade (domestic and foreign)33 reports
  2. Agriculture28 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code21 reports
  4. Environment and Superfund19 reports
  5. Food industry (safety, labeling)16 reports
  6. Health issues10 reports
  7. Housing2 reports
  8. Budget and appropriations1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES35 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE34 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Squire Patton Boggs$2.9M
    14 reports
  2. The Duberstein Group Inc.$262.5K
    5 reports
  3. Ernst & Young LLP (Washington Council Ernst & Young)$60K
    14 reports
  4. AO Development Company LLC$47K
    5 reports
  5. ArentFox Schiff LLP$0
    11 reports
  6. DHI CONSULTING GROUP, LLC$0
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.