Federal contractor · BOCA RATON, FL

ANTHOLOGY INC

ANTHOLOGY INC received $13.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−94% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $791.7K. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($13.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.7K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
L77LEKB2NRU1
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 224.6KFY2017
  2. 80.5KFY2020
  3. 70.5KFY2021
  4. 13.7KFY2022
  5. 56.4KFY2023
  6. 97.9KFY2024
  7. 234.6KFY2025
  8. 13.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$13.7K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$13.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Palm Beach County, FL$13.7K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $13.7K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $13.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. COURSE EVALUATION SOFTWARE WITH IDEA$68.3K
    Department of the Air Force· Palm Beach County, FL· IT & telecom· Apr 21, 2022 – Mar 26, 2026· FA700022C0018

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHARBENEAU INC$99.8K−100% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC$90.7K−100% in FY2026
    LINCOLN, IL · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ENOME INC$103.2K+3.4% in FY2026
    SAN MATEO, CA · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Anthology Inc.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$240K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$500K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$180K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$20K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$240K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Education13 reports
  2. Defense2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES13 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. THOMPSON COBURN LLP$500K
    13 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.