Federal contractor · FORT WORTH, TX

AOKA LLC

AOKA LLC received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+30% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $3.9M. Its largest customer was Department of Housing and Urban Development ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
4
Sole-source
34%
Single offer
93%
UEI
N7K7DHCU4DV9
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 105.6KFY2022
  2. 4.5KFY2023
  3. 1.2MFY2024
  4. 1.1MFY2025
  5. 1.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$970.5K66%
  2. Professional services$490.7K34%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.8M
  • Sole-source awards34%
    US 30% · $490.7K
  • Single-offer competitions93%
    US 8.8% · $1.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Housing and Urban Development · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Housing and Urban Development· Tarrant County, TX· Construction & real property· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· 86614126F00019
  2. Department of Housing and Urban Development· Tarrant County, TX· Construction & real property· Jul 10, 2025 – Sep 24, 2026· 86614125F00014
  3. Department of Housing and Urban Development· Tarrant County, TX· Construction & real property· Jul 23, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· 86614124F00018
  4. Department of Housing and Urban Development· Tarrant County, TX· Professional services· Jan 30, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026· 86615626C00002

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHousing and Urban Development · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BAYSIDE-LEETEX JV LLC$1M+1,069% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHousing and Urban Development · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ASHBURN, VA · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHousing and Urban Development · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 7 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.