Federal contractor · TUCSON, AZ

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC received $500 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $4.3M. Its largest customer was Missile Defense Agency ($500).

Obligations · FY2026
$500
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TKMCBDY89TD1
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 165.9KFY2020
  2. 172.2KFY2022
  3. 1.3MFY2023
  4. 2.5MFY2024
  5. 200KFY2025
  6. 500FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$500100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Pima County, AZ· Research & development· Aug 23, 2023 – Dec 18, 2025· N0001423C1062
  2. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· HQ085926FF346

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$2.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 547.7KFY2022
  2. 2MFY2023
  3. 0FY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2022–FY2024.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE PROBITAS PROJECT, INC.$2.4M−23% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. PACIFIC IMPACT ZONE SOLUTIONS INC$2.5M−100% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. TECTUS CORPORATION$2.2M+334% in FY2026
    CUPERTINO, CA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.