Federal contractor · FAIRBORN, OH

APPLIED OPTIMIZATION, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for APPLIED OPTIMIZATION, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $20.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
JGPNAVA6MSJ9
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.4MFY2017
  2. 2.8MFY2018
  3. 3MFY2019
  4. 2.8MFY2020
  5. 1.4MFY2021
  6. 2.4MFY2022
  7. 650KFY2023
  8. 2.8MFY2024
  9. 1.9MFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Research & development· Dec 12, 2023 – Apr 8, 2026· FA945124CX005
  2. Department of the Navy· Greene County, OH· Research & development· May 3, 2023 – Mar 26, 2026· N6833523C0121

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

APPLIED OPTIMIZATION, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$510K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 300KFY2021
  2. 210KFY2022
  3. 0FY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $256K paid out · $148K received
  • FY2022: $218.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $233.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $500K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $41.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $474.5K reported

  1. DAYTON, OH · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $922.9K reported

  1. BLAIRSVILLE, PA · 3 subawards
  2. WEST LAFAYETTE, IN · 1 subaward
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SEQUENT LOGIC LLC$4.5M−67% in FY2026
    LOGAN, UT · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. SK INFRARED INC$4.3M−100% in FY2026
    DUBLIN, OH · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. PERCEPTIVE INNOVATIONS, INC.$5.8M−100% in FY2026
    ASHBURN, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.