Federal contractor · CONGERS, NY

APTARGROUP INC

APTARGROUP INC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+81% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.4M. Its largest customer was Food and Drug Administration ($1.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
DQSJTPL8BBG4
Parent company
APTARGROUP, INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 35.3KFY2017
  2. 439.7KFY2023
  3. 1.1MFY2024
  4. 650KFY2025
  5. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Food and Drug Administration$1.2M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. McHenry County, IL$1.2M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $1.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. RESEARCH CHALLENGES RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY PROPELLANTS IN METERED DOSE INHALERS$3.4M
    Food and Drug Administration· McHenry County, IL· Professional services· Sep 20, 2023 – Sep 28, 2026· 75F40123C00186

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE$2.7M−79% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. TRANQUIL CLINICAL AND RESEARCH CONSULTING SERVICES LLC$4.1M
    WEBSTER, TX · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$4.2M−99% in FY2026
    ROCHESTER, NY · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • AptarGroup, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$240K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$810K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$230K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$240K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$240K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$100K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Agriculture14 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  3. Health issues14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$810K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.