Federal contractor · CHAMBERSBURG, PA

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANTS, INC.

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. received $147.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $767.3K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($127.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$147.7K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
14%
UEI
ZMZNPM4KL4Z3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.7KFY2017
  2. 15.9KFY2018
  3. 16.2KFY2019
  4. 81.5KFY2020
  5. 19.5KFY2021
  6. 112.2KFY2022
  7. 91.9KFY2023
  8. 135.7KFY2024
  9. 130KFY2025
  10. 147.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$127.6K86%
    1 awards
  2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service$20.1K14%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$147.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Franklin County, PA$127.6K86%
  2. Crawford County, PA$20.1K14%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition14%
    US 39% · $20.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.7% · $20.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH THE REQUIRED PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, AND TRANSPORTATION, AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL SERVICES ON THE RAYSTOWN LAKE PROJECT IN HUNTINGDON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.$127.6K
    Department of the Army· Franklin County, PA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· W912DR26PA014
  2. PA ERIE NWR INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL WET$20.1K
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Crawford County, PA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 24, 2026 – Jun 24, 2026· 140FS326P0168

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GORE MELISSA A$360.7K−28% in FY2026
    WOODVILLE, TX · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. RAD LAWN CARE, INC.$361.4K−16% in FY2026
    BELLEVUE, IA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. COX MAINTENANCE LLC$361.6K+821% in FY2026
    SPENCER, OK · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.