Federal contractor · CHICAGO, IL

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY received $22.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 19 awards (−64% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $817.6M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Marketing Service ($22.8M). It also received $541.4K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$22.8M
New awards
19
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
85%
UEI
N1EULGPZUSK3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 90.4MFY2017
  2. 39.8MFY2018
  3. 50.7MFY2019
  4. 68.5MFY2020
  5. 85.5MFY2021
  6. 157.8MFY2022
  7. 139.1MFY2023
  8. 99.3MFY2024
  9. 63.6MFY2025
  10. 22.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 19 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$22.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Erie County, NY$24.8K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition85%
    US 39% · $19.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions85%
    US 8.7% · $19.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Agricultural Marketing Service· St. Charles Parish, LA· Other equipment & supplies· May 21, 2025 – Aug 6, 2026· 121NTB25C0026
  2. Agricultural Marketing Service· St. Charles Parish, LA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· 121NTB26C0016
  3. Agricultural Marketing Service· St. Charles Parish, LA· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 18, 2024 – Sep 10, 2026· 121NTB24C0010
  4. Agricultural Marketing Service· St. Charles Parish, LA· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 20, 2022 – Sep 10, 2026· 121NTB22C0024
  5. Agricultural Marketing Service· St. Charles Parish, LA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 9, 2025 – Sep 10, 2026· 121NTB25C0018
  6. Agricultural Marketing Service· St. Charles Parish, LA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 28, 2024 – Sep 23, 2026· 121NTB24C0021
  7. Agricultural Marketing Service· Marion County, IN· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 8, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025· 123J1426C0240
  8. Agricultural Marketing Service· Hamilton County, TN· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 8, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025· 123J1426C0242

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY received $541.4K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 5 actions (4 new awards), −97% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 10.867 · Bioenergy Program for Advanced Biofuels ($541.4K).

Assistance · FY2026
$541.4K
New awards
4
Actions
5
Since FY2021
$160.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.9MFY2021
  2. 50.2MFY2022
  3. 90.5MFY2023
  4. 504KFY2024
  5. 16.2MFY2025
  6. 541.4KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$541.4K100%

Top programs

  1. 10.867 · Bioenergy Program for Advanced Biofuels$541.4K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 10.937 · Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities· Natural Resources Conservation Service· Project grant· Jun 15, 2023 – Jun 29, 2026· NR233A750004G053
  2. 10.867 · Bioenergy Program for Advanced Biofuels· Rural Business Cooperative Service· Project grant· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· PAYR25PP0002967

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $160K reported

  1. MSE TECH LLC$160K
    WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SUPREME RICE, LLC$106.2M−50% in FY2026
    CROWLEY, LA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Grain and oilseed milling
  2. DIDION, INC.$132.1M+687% in FY2026
    CAMBRIA, WI · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Grain and oilseed milling
  3. FARMERS RICE MILLING CO LLC$76.2M−52% in FY2026
    LAKE CHARLES, LA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Grain and oilseed milling

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANYAI match · 100%
  • ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY-ADM PACAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$6.8M
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$16.8M
$16.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$137.2K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.7M
    5 reports
  2. 2024$3.7M
    14 reports
  3. 2025$6.8M
    12 reports
  4. 2026$3.6M
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code28 reports
  2. Agriculture25 reports
  3. Energy and nuclear22 reports
  4. Trade (domestic and foreign)18 reports
  5. Transportation17 reports
  6. Food industry (safety, labeling)14 reports
  7. Fuel, gas and oil13 reports
  8. Environment and Superfund7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE32 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES30 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Mehlman Consulting, Inc.$840K
    11 reports
  2. BGR Government Affairs$350K
    4 reports
  3. Second Curve Strategies LLC$190K
    4 reports
  4. Baker & Hostetler LLP$150K
    4 reports
  5. Miller Strategies, LLC$50K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$105.2K77%
  2. Democratic$32K23%

PACs sponsored

  • ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY - ADM PAC$205K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.