Federal contractor · SALT LAKE CITY, UT

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN WEST PC

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN WEST PC received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
1.4%
UEI
FYZNNMRKL7Z2
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 293.7KFY2017
  2. 150.8KFY2018
  3. 500FY2019
  4. 153.3KFY2020
  5. 277.2KFY2021
  6. 539.5KFY2022
  7. 1.1MFY2023
  8. 1.9MFY2024
  9. 1.6MFY2025
  10. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$1.9M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Davis County, UT$1.9M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.4%
    US 39% · $27.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions1.4%
    US 8.7% · $27.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. A-E SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF HILL AFB 75TH CEG/CEN REQUIREMENTS AND ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOW DATED 10 FEBRUARY 2026.$1.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Construction & real property· Mar 5, 2026 – Apr 13, 2026· FA820126F0083
  2. A-E SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF HILL AFB 75TH CEG/CEN REQUIREMENTS AND ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOW DATED 20 DECEMBER 2018.$26.7K
    Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Construction & real property· Mar 3, 2026 – Mar 3, 2026· FA820126F0072
  3. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A QUALITY CONTROL PLAN TO BE ISSUED AS THE FIRST TASK ORDER TO MEET THE MINIMUM ORDER GUARANTEE FOR THIS ACQUISITION.$500
    Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Construction & real property· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· FA820126F0102

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $84.8K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1.4M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $1.5M reported

  1. LYNK ENGINEERS, LLC$846.8K
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. VAN BOERUM & FRANK ASSOCIATES INC$540.3K
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.$52.5K
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EVINCE ANALYTICS, INCORPORATED$4.3M−23% in FY2026
    VIENNA, VA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KES SERES JV, LLC$5.2M−5.8% in FY2026
    MARLBOROUGH, MA · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. JP HARVEY - STANTEC JOINT VENTURE$4.2M−100% in FY2026
    HAMPTON, VA · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.