Federal contractor · YORK, PA
ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, INC.
ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, INC. received $75.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Since FY2018: $450.8K. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($75.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $75.6K
- New awards
- 1
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- MFA3FBUVUMM8
- Parent company
- INTERTEK GROUP PLC
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC. company family: 4 registered entities, $57.1K in FY2026 together. See the family
- INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC.CORTLAND, NY · Family page-$18.5K
- $0
- PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INCARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- -4.3KFY2018
- 171.9KFY2019
- 103.6KFY2020
- 94.6KFY2022
- -24KFY2023
- 33.3KFY2024
- 75.6KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Public Buildings Service$75.6K100%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$75.6K100%
Where the work was performed
- Winchester city, VA$75.6K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $75.6K
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $75.6K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Public Buildings Service$75.6KGeneral Services Administration · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Public Buildings Service· Winchester city, VA· Professional services· Oct 15, 2025 – Jun 26, 2026· 47PD0226P0003
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $342.5K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $256.3K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $10.6K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $343.7K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
16 companies · $3.6M reported
- BIRMINGHAM, AL · 4 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
- CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- DAWSON MCG, INC.$343.7KHONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward · Services to buildings and dwellings
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 16 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- GREAT LAKES COMMISSION$373.9K−32% in FY2026ANN ARBOR, MI · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- MONROVIA, CA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES, INC.$602.7K−100% in FY2026SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.