Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, MD

ARCSOURCE GROUP, INC

ARCSOURCE GROUP, INC received $3.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+55% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.1M. Its largest customer was Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.1M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VJJJUYFL66J5
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 379.4KFY2017
  2. 1.4MFY2018
  3. -131.1KFY2019
  4. 327KFY2020
  5. 774.9KFY2021
  6. 2.7MFY2022
  7. 2.4MFY2023
  8. 3MFY2024
  9. 2MFY2025
  10. 3.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.3M72%
  2. IT & telecom$844.9K27%
  3. Education & social services$34.9K1.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bexar County, TX$181.9K5.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$126.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$126.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jun 30, 2022 – Jun 10, 2026· FA701422F0140
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 27, 2022 – Jun 15, 2026· 75D30122F14999
  3. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jul 30, 2021 – Jan 28, 2026· FA805221F0030
  4. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· Howard County, MD· Professional services· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 7571TE26F80364
  5. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Howard County, MD· Education & social services· Oct 1, 2022 – Mar 13, 2026· 20340923C00002
  6. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 21, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· 70SBUR26F00000241
  7. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services· Howard County, MD· Professional services· Jun 27, 2019 – Nov 21, 2025· 70SBUR19C00000014

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.5M received
  • FY2022: $1.3M paid out · $7.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $1.3M reported

  1. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $10.8M reported

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QUEENSTOWN, MD · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ZAPATA/AME JV, LLC$4M−93% in FY2026
    CHARLOTTE, NC · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MACON, GA · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.