Federal contractor · DAYTON, OH

ARDENT TECHNOLOGIES INC

ARDENT TECHNOLOGIES INC received $6.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $83.8M. Its largest customer was Defense Health Agency ($3.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.5M
New awards
18
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
9.6%
UEI
KKZ6VV15MBK7
Parent company
ARDENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.2MFY2017
  2. 9.6MFY2018
  3. 8.2MFY2019
  4. 7.8MFY2020
  5. 5.1MFY2021
  6. 8.7MFY2022
  7. 12.7MFY2023
  8. 11.4MFY2024
  9. 9.7MFY2025
  10. 6.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 5 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 4 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. U.S. Coast Guard-$141.7K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$6.6M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition9.6%
    US 39% · $622.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions9.6%
    US 8.8% · $622.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Sep 29, 2024 – Jun 10, 2026· FA700024F0124
  2. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Jul 28, 2022 – Jun 9, 2026· FA239622F0250
  3. Defense Health Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Mar 22, 2024 – May 22, 2026· HT001124F0016
  4. Department of the Air Force· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Oct 26, 2022 – May 1, 2026· FA805223F0002
  5. Defense Health Agency· Frederick County, MD· Professional services· Oct 26, 2022 – May 21, 2026· HT942523F0001
  6. Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 29, 2023 – May 1, 2026· FA805223F0029
  7. Defense Health Agency· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Jun 17, 2024 – Jan 8, 2026· HT001124F0027
  8. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Aug 10, 2021 – Sep 22, 2026· 693JJ421F000044

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $1.7M reported

  1. PALMETTO, FL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ADC ENGINEERING INC$12.5M−99% in FY2026
    HANAHAN, SC · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HB&A, LLC$10.6M−89% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ZEL TECHNOLOGIES LLC$13.3M+2% in FY2026
    HAMPTON, VA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.