Federal contractor · FORT SMITH, AR

ARKANSAS OKLAHOMA GAS CORPORATION

ARKANSAS OKLAHOMA GAS CORPORATION received $20K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $340.9K. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($20K).

Obligations · FY2026: $20K
New awards: 1
Sole-source: 100%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: WV6JA5B5WU75
Parent company: OGE ENERGY CORP

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the OGE ENERGY CORP company family: 2 registered entities, $4.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

OGE ENERGY CORPOKLAHOMA CITY, OK · Family page
Reported parent$4.1M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

15KFY2017
18KFY2018
19.8KFY2019
54.4KFY2020
18.5KFY2021
20KFY2022
76.3KFY2023
-10.3KFY2024
109.1KFY2025
20KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Department of Energy$20K100%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Facilities & utilities$20K100%

Where the work was performed

Sebastian County, AR$20K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $20K
Sole-source awards100%
US 30% · $20K
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.7% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

OT:: NATURAL GAS SERVICES FOR FORT CHAFFEE FOR 10 YEARS FOR OFFICE OF SECURE TRANSPORTATION - NA-15.$215.5K
Department of Energy· Sebastian County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2022 – Dec 9, 2025· 89233122CNA000274

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

VANDENBERG SOLAR I, LLC$11.3M−19% in FY2026
LOMPOC, CA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
COOPERATIVE UTILITY SERVICES LLC$10.1M+92% in FY2026
UNION SPRINGS, AL · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT$9.4M−29% in FY2026
OMAHA, 0 · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of OGE ENERGY CORP (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

OGE ENERGY CORPAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $400K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $1.4M
PAC giving · 2026: $13.5K; 1 PAC

Lobbying by year

2023$400K
4 reports
2024$380K
4 reports
2025$400K
4 reports
2026$240K
2 reports

Top issues

Environment and Superfund14 reports
Homeland security14 reports
Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code14 reports
Utilities14 reports
Indian and Native American affairs11 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Williams and Jensen, PLLC$1.4M
14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$13.5K100%

PACs sponsored

OGE ENERGY CORP EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$207.2K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Tom Cole$3,500
R-OK-4 · House · 1 PAC
Frank D. Lucas$3,500
R-OK-3 · House · 1 PAC
Kevin Hern$2,500
R-OK-1 · House · 1 PAC
Tom Cotton$1,500
R-AR · Senate · 1 PAC
Markwayne Mullin$1,500
R-OK · Senate · 1 PAC

$12.5K of the $13.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 5 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Tom Cole$10K
R-OK-4 · House · 1 PAC
James Lankford$2,500
R-OK · Senate · 1 PAC
Markwayne Mullin$2,500
R-OK · Senate · 1 PAC
Steve Womack$1,000
R-AR-3 · House · 1 PAC

$16K of the $16K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 4 members of Congress.

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 2617 · Consolidated Appropriations Act, 20238 reports
117th Congress · Became law · 2023–2024
H.R. 1 · Lower Energy Costs Act5 reports
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2023–2024
H.R. 1 · An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.4 reports
119th Congress · Became law · 2025–2026

12 of 14 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.