Federal contractor · POWELL, OH

ARMADA, LTD.

ARMADA, LTD. received $8.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $121.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($4.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.7M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.7%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WA9AY2GKXYG8
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.2MFY2017
  2. 6.7MFY2018
  3. 14.1MFY2019
  4. 13.4MFY2020
  5. 12.6MFY2021
  6. 10.3MFY2022
  7. 16.6MFY2023
  8. 19.5MFY2024
  9. 12.7MFY2025
  10. 8.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$4.8M55%
    4 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$2.8M32%
    3 awards
  3. Offices, Boards and Divisions$1M12%
    1 awards
  4. Department of State$59.1K0.7%
    1 awards
  5. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-$15.4K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$5.9M68%
  2. Research & development$2.7M31%
  3. IT & telecom$59.1K0.7%
  4. Education & social services$1,2670.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Okaloosa County, FL$3M35%
  2. Newport County, RI$2.7M31%
  3. St. Mary's County, MD$2.1M24%
  4. Delaware County, OH$1M12%
  5. Abroad$59.1K0.7%
  6. Chesapeake city, VA$1,2670.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.5%
    US 39% · $43.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.7%
    US 30% · $59.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$15.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of State$59.1K
    Department of State · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. EOUSA SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT STAFF (SEMS)$24.7M
    Offices, Boards and Divisions· Delaware County, OH· Professional services· Sep 28, 2020 – Apr 24, 2026· 15JPSS20F00000677
  2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACQUISITION IS TO ACQUIRE ANTITERRORISM/NAVY SECURITY FORCE (AT/NSF) INSTRUCTOR SERVICES REQUIRED BY THE CENTER FOR SECURITY FORCES (CENSECFOR) FOR THEIR TRAINING SITES WITHIN THE EASTERN REGIONS.$17.7M
    Department of the Navy· Chesapeake city, VA· Education & social services· Jun 29, 2023 – Mar 26, 2026· N0018923F3029
  3. SECURITY SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER DIVISION, NEWPORT CODE 105.$7.8M
    Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Research & development· Aug 22, 2024 – May 28, 2026· N6660424F3015
  4. SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES, TO INCLUDE CYBERSECURITY/INFORMATION ASSURANCE, INFORMATION SECURITY, PERSONNEL SECURITY, AND PHYSICAL SECURITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT, FOR THE 505TH COMMAND AND CONTROL WING.$6.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Professional services· Jan 10, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· FA489025F0005
  5. PROCURE CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES TO CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION BY PROVIDING HIGHLY QUALIFIED SECURITY PROFESSIONALS TO ENSURE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL ENHANCED SECURITY POLICIES.$3.5M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Professional services· Aug 6, 2025 – May 7, 2026· N0042125F3013
  6. EMT/LVN INSTRUCTORS FOR THE 59TH MDW$1.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jun 25, 2020 – Jun 5, 2026· FA301620F0239
  7. SPECIAL SECURITY OFFICER (SSO) SERVICES FOR OPR SAN FRANCISCO$1.3M
    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement· San Francisco County, CA· Professional services· Aug 23, 2022 – Sep 25, 2026· 70CMSD22FR0000108
  8. EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN PARAMEDIC (EMT) INSTRUCTORS, QTY 6$1.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Education & social services· Jul 30, 2025 – May 27, 2026· FA301625F0293

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $617.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $7.7M reported

  1. CHEROKEE NATION MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, L.L.C..$6.4M
    TULSA, OK · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SERCO INC$793.6K
    HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SYSTEM HIGH CORPORATION$497.4K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NICKLAUS AMEC JV$19.1M−87% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BEVILACQUA RESEARCH CORPORATION$19.7M+148% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. XST INC.$20M−52% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.