Federal contractor · SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT

ARROW TECH ASSOCIATES, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for ARROW TECH ASSOCIATES, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $11.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
4
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
R441BUY41WF8
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 136.9KFY2017
  2. 146KFY2018
  3. 304KFY2019
  4. 4.7MFY2020
  5. 126KFY2021
  6. 1.8MFY2022
  7. 2.6MFY2023
  8. 1.1MFY2024
  9. 258.4KFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$00.0%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. REAL-TIME MAGNETIC FIELD GENERATOR FOR HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP TESTING PHASE I$176.2K
    Department of the Air Force· Chittenden County, VT· Research & development· Jul 22, 2024 – Dec 19, 2025· FA865124PB013
  2. RANGE REDUCTION OF NASA VEHICLES$65.7K
    Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Aug 10, 2021 – Feb 5, 2026· W911QX21P0182
  3. ANALYSIS OF UP TO 30 SETS OF ORTHOGONAL SPARK SHADOWGRAPH, SENSOR DATA, AND/OR OTHER IMAGERY FILES OF NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) FLIGHT VEHICLES UNDER LIVE FIRE TO DETERMINE AERODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS AND DYNAMIC STABILITY.$42.3K
    Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Research & development· Sep 9, 2025 – Jun 11, 2026· W911QX25PA091
  4. PRODAS V3 MAIN ANALYSIS PACKAGE$11K
    Department of the Navy· Monterey County, CA· IT & telecom· Aug 28, 2025 – Feb 4, 2026· N0024425PS119

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $161.3K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $500.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $109.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $771.1K reported

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$411.7K
    TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$301.2K
    GROTON, CT · 4 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$58.3K
    MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NDN-SUNDANCE JV ALLIANCE LLC$947.5K+3.8% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. GOLDENWOLF - CRAWFORD CONSULTING SERVICES JOINT VENTURE LLC$1M+100% in FY2026
    LITHIA, FL · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BLDI, LLC$1.1M+27% in FY2026
    GRAND RAPIDS, MI · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.