Federal contractor · STONINGTON, CT

ASA ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS INC

ASA ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS INC received $43.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+272% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.3M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($40.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$43.3K
New awards
4
Sole-source
4.4%
Single offer
1.7%
UEI
NGMSB6M2QKA4
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 69.7KFY2017
  2. 4.5KFY2018
  3. 1.6MFY2019
  4. 14.4KFY2020
  5. 443.6KFY2021
  6. 27.8KFY2022
  7. 41.7KFY2023
  8. 94.9KFY2024
  9. 11.7KFY2025
  10. 43.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$21.8K50%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$21.5K50%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition6.1%
    US 39% · $2,663
  • Sole-source awards4.4%
    US 30% · $1,906
  • Single-offer competitions1.7%
    US 8.7% · $757
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Coast Guard· Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 70Z08026P20500B00
  2. U.S. Coast Guard· Kings County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 26, 2026 – Jan 26, 2026· 70Z03826FP0000005
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Portsmouth city, VA· Other equipment & supplies· May 19, 2026 – May 19, 2026· SPMYM126P9922
  4. Department of the Navy· Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 20, 2026 – Mar 20, 2026· N6449826FG099

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $237.5K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $945.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $301.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $360.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.8M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 27 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. FAIRFIELD, NJ · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward · Ship and boat building

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OKINAWA-SHOKUSENKI-HANBAI INC.$226.4K−28% in FY2026
    NAHA CITY, JPN · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Soap, cleaning compound, and toilet preparation manufacturing
  2. CHEMTEK INC$312.9K+44% in FY2026
    BLANCH, NC · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Soap, cleaning compound, and toilet preparation manufacturing
  3. CHRISTEYNS NORTH AMERICA, LLC$435.2K+173% in FY2026
    GREENVILLE, NC · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Soap, cleaning compound, and toilet preparation manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 12 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.