Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

ASET PARTNERS CORP.

ASET PARTNERS CORP. received $6.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+6,133% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.1M. Its largest customer was Office of Procurement Operations ($4.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.2M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
X7VDRNMZFWL6
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ASET PARTNERS CORP. company family: 2 registered entities, $12.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ASET PARTNERS CORP.ALEXANDRIA, VA · Family page
    $6.3M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2017
  2. 740.4KFY2018
  3. 779.1KFY2019
  4. 183.6KFY2020
  5. -29.8KFY2023
  6. -14KFY2024
  7. 99.9KFY2025
  8. 6.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$4.8M76%
  2. IT & telecom$1.5M24%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 1, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 70RTAC26FC0000007
  2. Transportation Security Administration· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 2, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70T03026F7667N029
  3. Federal Emergency Management Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026· 70FA3126F00000086
  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 22, 2016 – Oct 8, 2025· DOC46PAPT1600347

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $423.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. GUIDEHOUSE INC.$423.4K100%
    MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $17.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $423.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $9.6M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SOFITC3, LLC$33.1M−75% in FY2026
    PISCATAWAY, NJ · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Computer systems design and related services
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Emergency Management Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CVTEK LLC$9.9M−16% in FY2026
    MC LEAN, VA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Computer systems design and related servicesU.S. Secret Service · Computer systems design and related servicesU.S. Coast Guard · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.